Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
MaineDAWG2008 said:
View attachment 31402
Click to expand...

No doubt that Epstein deliberately engratiated himself with the highest levels of power to shield himself from scrutiny and investigation.

0_Prince-Charles-1999.jpg



Doesn't necessarily follow that they had to incriminate themselves (although I do think Randy Andy is guilty) but just the association would have been enough to protect him.

It worked the first time, if Harvey Weinstein had never been exposed, JE might have gotten away with that initial slap on the wrist.
 
Uncle Wally One Ball said:
There is you not being big on conspiracies again
Click to expand...

I've changed my initial angry gut reaction to this and answered it on the covid thread. As I've said to you before I'm not in your custody or answerable to you or anybody else. Me querying a highly suspicious death of a suspect who could have caused a lot of damage to some very rich and powerful people if he gave evidence doesn't make me a conspiracy nut it's an opinion that differs to yours.

As it's linked into my post on the covid thread I'll add this. It's been a very mentally draining and stressful time for lots of people. Many are at breaking point with the endless groundhog day of restrictions, rules, lockdowns and just when it looks like we are turning a corner we look to be going back to square one. Many feel helpless and are trying to make sense of it all, it is psychologically damaging. Attitudes like yours to anyone who dares to post something you disagree with add to that damage. You're a bully
 
Last edited:
johnnymarrsbarres said:
Suspecting Epstein was whacked really doesn’t make you a conspiracy theorist.

It’s a very plausible, even likely scenario.

Not like you’re saying the moon is made of cheese, or the earth is flat, or spouting off Trump anon shite is it.
Click to expand...
Within the spectrum of widely disseminated conspiracy theories (which it must be defined as, because hasn’t been substantially proven to be true) it is definitely one of the most plausible.

It seems perfectly logical that he was murdered, and I would say, more likely than not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top