LesBleuMiserable
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2011
- Messages
- 3,774
Had not realised I had believed he was free agent in summer35M with 18 months remaining on his contract? Highly unlikely he will wait until summer 2023 before he leaves.
Had not realised I had believed he was free agent in summer35M with 18 months remaining on his contract? Highly unlikely he will wait until summer 2023 before he leaves.
We could if we sell TorresWe are not getting both
DreamlandWe could if we sell Torres
Keeper had a mare and should've saved itFirst goal was stunning
Interesting, he mentions Arsenal by name:![]()
Vlahovic rejects the biggest contract in Fiorentina's history
Red-hot forward Vlahovic, 21, is understood to be coveted by the likes of Manchester United and Juventus - while Arsenal and Tottenham may also be in the race.www.dailymail.co.uk
Yes, Choose Guardiola. Choose life!
There will be two possible destination in Premier League, us and spurs. The prospect playing with proven coach like Pep or Conte to improve his game further will tempted him to make move playing abroad.
I'd say we should buy Vlahovic if he is available in January as Haaland very likely won't be. We let it ride and wait until summer- Vlahovic will get scooped up and there's no guarantee Haalands sitting there waiting for us. I don't want 7-0 thumpings of bottom tier clubs obscure the fact that we really arent better off long term or even for the rest of the current campaigns with zero pure strikers. To me Vlahovic is slightly under the radar whilst Haaland is touted as the next Superman and will require Superman wages and finance to acquire whilst Vlahovic would require much less and has the tools minus the hype to do just as good a job while allowing us more cash to make other acquisitions. Both are gambles as the transition to the premier league for either of them will require a learning curve.
I’ve never been this confident in the Haaland front. Having said this, I don’t think a club like Arsenal can afford Vlahovic in JanuaryWe certainly need one of them imo and if we don’t go for Vlahovic in January then we will have been told that Haaland is ours in the summer!
Don't think we've that strong an interest in him, if Jan comes and goes with no striker, I wouldn't take it as an indication on Haaland.We certainly need one of them imo and if we don’t go for Vlahovic in January then we will have been told that Haaland is ours in the summer!
Agreed, unless they sell their now ex-captain ...... but, why would Vlahovic consider going to the Arse if he has any ambition?I’ve never been this confident in the Haaland front. Having said this, I don’t think a club like Arsenal can afford Vlahovic in January
I understand your point and I dont think we are signing Haaland however, you can guarantee we will know for sure his position before we move on and if we sign Vlahovic its because Haaland is off the table.I'd say we should buy Vlahovic if he is available in January as Haaland very likely won't be. We let it ride and wait until summer- Vlahovic will get scooped up and there's no guarantee Haalands sitting there waiting for us. I don't want 7-0 thumpings of bottom tier clubs obscure the fact that we really arent better off long term or even for the rest of the current campaigns with zero pure strikers. To me Vlahovic is slightly under the radar whilst Haaland is touted as the next Superman and will require Superman wages and finance to acquire whilst Vlahovic would require much less and has the tools minus the hype to do just as good a job while allowing us more cash to make other acquisitions. Both are gambles as the transition to the premier league for either of them will require a learning curve.
In decent company there tbf
Apart from Lingard and Martial…..and send them out on loan to our sister club in Antarctica. That’ll teach the fuckers.I don't think we'll sign anyone in January
Connor Roy?It's the lad from Ferris Bueller's Day off:
![]()
Eric Garcia ?It's the lad from Ferris Bueller's Day off:
![]()