Coronavirus (2022) thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
How serious are they damaged?
My young gp has multi organ damage from covid , on a ventilator in the first wave , he has just had to retire , my lungs took well over a year to recover , for some the damage kills them , it can be really serious or a six months of post viral fatique
 
While 17k people lost is very sad,I'm yet to be convinced that this period in our lives was worthy of causing or exacerbating the consequences elsewhere.
I feel many people have been brainwashed through fear,rather than fact.If the real figures had been published from the get go,then the majority would have seen this virus for what it is.
It's not just 17,000 - excess deaths vs the 5 year average from the start of the pandemic to the end of 2021 were just over 133,000.
 
Here's my two pence worth. It doesn't matter if you had underlying health conditions, if the virus killed you it killed you, sadly I know from my families experience. 17000 deaths or whatever is ridiculous, look at the excess deaths. We don't live in a police state like North Korea, PHE and the ONS have not made up or exaggerated numbers.
 
I see more antiviral medication coming online..and more In the pipeline..winning the battle now
 
While 17k people lost is very sad,I'm yet to be convinced that this period in our lives was worthy of causing or exacerbating the consequences elsewhere.
I feel many people have been brainwashed through fear,rather than fact.If the real figures had been published from the get go,then the majority would have seen this virus for what it is.
You are embarrassing yourself quoting 17k.
 
While 17k people lost is very sad,I'm yet to be convinced that this period in our lives was worthy of causing or exacerbating the consequences elsewhere.
I feel many people have been brainwashed through fear,rather than fact.If the real figures had been published from the get go,then the majority would have seen this virus for what it is.

completely agree
 
While 17k people lost is very sad,I'm yet to be convinced that this period in our lives was worthy of causing or exacerbating the consequences elsewhere.
I feel many people have been brainwashed through fear,rather than fact.If the real figures had been published from the get go,then the majority would have seen this virus for what it is.
I suspect in the cold light of day, we will look back on this in a few years time as being a significant over-reaction to what is undoubtedly a nasty virus, but nowhere near significant enough (To the global population) to cause the level of global disruption and misery we inflicted, that we will be paying for for generations.

if we’d taken the money we’ve spent on furlough, test and trace, Lateral Flow/PCR tests, etc etc, and instead invested that in the NHS, we’d probably have the best health facilities in the world.

I also can’t begin to imagine the numbers of face masks and latex gloves that we’ve manufactured/ discarded that will pollute rivers and oceans.
 
I suspect in the cold light of day, we will look back on this in a few years time as being a significant over-reaction to what is undoubtedly a nasty virus, but nowhere near significant enough (To the global population) to cause the level of global disruption and misery we inflicted, that we will be paying for for generations.

if we’d taken the money we’ve spent on furlough, test and trace, Lateral Flow/PCR tests, etc etc, and instead invested that in the NHS, we’d probably have the best health facilities in the world.

I also can’t begin to imagine the numbers of face masks and latex gloves that we’ve manufactured/ discarded that will pollute rivers and oceans.
If we'd dne that before covid then yes. Unfortuanately we didn't so when covid hit we had to deal with the NHS as it was not how we'd have liked or needed it to be.
 
Head teacher on the radio this morning claiming we are “failing a WHOLE generation of children by easing restrictions and should tighten them up”.

a whole generation. He referenced how many children have ‘long covid’ in his school. 40% he reckons. I known for a fact kids were claiming to have covid when they didnt for the time off. He naive in the extreme if he thinks kids arent claiming long covid for unscrupulous reasons

utter bollocks and only uttered by people employed in the public sector who, come what may, get paid regardless.

Its over. Move on
He sounds like he is not fit to be a Headteacher. Even if it was true (and it seems far-fetched to claim 40 per cent of his kids have long Covid) he should not be fuelling the panic by broadcasting it. If he had any leadership skills he would manage the situation in a calm measured way.
 
I suspect in the cold light of day, we will look back on this in a few years time as being a significant over-reaction to what is undoubtedly a nasty virus, but nowhere near significant enough (To the global population) to cause the level of global disruption and misery we inflicted, that we will be paying for for generations.

if we’d taken the money we’ve spent on furlough, test and trace, Lateral Flow/PCR tests, etc etc, and instead invested that in the NHS, we’d probably have the best health facilities in the world.

I also can’t begin to imagine the numbers of face masks and latex gloves that we’ve manufactured/ discarded that will pollute rivers and oceans.
I think there is probably some truth in this. However hindsight is always a great thing. The first strain of Covid was a lot more lethal than the current one but no one knew this at the time. It would have been madness to let it rip without knowing the risks of doing this. No doubt lots of mistakes have been made in the way it has been handled.
Personally I think the world has been lucky. If Covid was as lethal as some other viruses we have seen in the past, like Mers for example, it would have been a disaster for the planet. Let's hope some lessons are learned and better protection is put into place.
 
I suspect in the cold light of day, we will look back on this in a few years time as being a significant over-reaction to what is undoubtedly a nasty virus, but nowhere near significant enough (To the global population) to cause the level of global disruption and misery we inflicted, that we will be paying for for generations.

if we’d taken the money we’ve spent on furlough, test and trace, Lateral Flow/PCR tests, etc etc, and instead invested that in the NHS, we’d probably have the best health facilities in the world.

I also can’t begin to imagine the numbers of face masks and latex gloves that we’ve manufactured/ discarded that will pollute rivers and oceans.

We couldn't run the risk of hospitals being completely overrun and hospital beds/ICU being all taken, we was very very close to that point - lockdown saved the NHS
 
We couldn't run the risk of hospitals being completely overrun and hospital beds/ICU being all taken, we was very very close to that point - lockdown saved the NHS
We'll never be able to put numbers on it but lockdowns saved covid and non covid lives.
 
I think there is probably some truth in this. However hindsight is always a great thing. The first strain of Covid was a lot more lethal than the current one but no one knew this at the time. It would have been madness to let it rip without knowing the risks of doing this. No doubt lots of mistakes have been made in the way it has been handled.
Personally I think the world has been lucky. If Covid was as lethal as some other viruses we have seen in the past, like Mers for example, it would have been a disaster for the planet. Let's hope some lessons are learned and better protection is put into place.
The lethality (mainly to at risk groups) were known fairly early on, certainly before decisions like lockdown/keeping kids at home etc were known. Had we been dealing with MERS levels then the response would have been proportionate. I believed it was disproportionate at the time, and even more so now.
 
The lethality (mainly to at risk groups) were known fairly early on, certainly before decisions like lockdown/keeping kids at home etc were known. Had we been dealing with MERS levels then the response would have been proportionate. I believed it was disproportionate at the time, and even more so now.
I think the biggest lesson we have to learn is the chronic state of the health of this nation. The UK and the USA have suffered badly because we have too much obesity, diabetes etc in a generally unhealthy population. Surely all of us can agree that it would be a good idea to improve everyone's health (I include myself in this) so we are all more resilient to future threats. There are people in my gym in their 70s who put me to shame with their fitness levels!
 
We couldn't run the risk of hospitals being completely overrun and hospital beds/ICU being all taken, we was very very close to that point - lockdown saved the NHS
The NHS exists to serve the country to the best of its ability considering the investment in it. The country doesn’t run to ensure the health service isn’t overwhelmed. That’s a nice to have.

We had viruses/pandemics before we had a health service, yet we still got on with it.

Had the NHS been overrun, we would have dealt (or not) with it, but the death count wouldn’t have been massively different I expect (other countries without health services aren’t seeing massively different numbers). In any event, it certainly wasn’t being overrun by kids and healthy working adults…yet these were the people we were locking down and who will pay the price.

The worlds population grew by about 1% in 2021 so circa 80M. We’ve lost close to 6M with (not due to) Covid. 6M is 0.0075% of the worlds population.

We struggle to see it at the local/Human level, but on a global scale, looking at the numbers, the impact on the health of the human race is inconsequential.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top