mrbelfry
Well-Known Member
Edit: due to inappropriate comment. ThanksI hate you Nick Harris
Last edited:
Edit: due to inappropriate comment. ThanksI hate you Nick Harris
I know for a fact an absolute shit load of my family who were Blues swapped sides in the aftermath, the only one who didn’t lived on Platt Lane next to the Princess Parkway junction .Where do you source your data from moomey?
One thing notable about City's crowds is that we plunge in 1958?! It would be quite interesting to know what the impact was on Manchester City fans of the Munich Air disaster. I bet it was devastating. I've got a vague feeling I read something about this in Colin Schindlers Man Utd ruined my life.
Thought the Joshua Tree was ok but yeah after that they did start MLK ing it.B
Bad, written about a heroin addicted friend in Dublin, is one of the very best U2 tunes before they lost the plot, started wearing cowboy hats and pretending to be American
Lines of Charlie?Merson is the consummate professional pundit and spends hours pre-show practicing his lines.
Lines of Charlie?
Now you see it.Bark at The Moon ?
I,'ll get my coat.
You can also see it all in private mode on Google chrome if you have that on your phoneThanks Blue.
Nick if u r reading this I love u & think u r wonderfulHe’s a bit fucking odd to say the least. Just catching up but on his tweettamajiggy he mentions that blues don’t like him because he gave evidence in the Bennel trial? Well for one I’ve hated the **** long before that and two, I had no idea he gave evidence so that has no bearing on me thinking he’s a ****. It’s his lack of integrity on any City related content he puts across and his long held dislike of our owners that made my mind up, nothing else. By trying to say we are in some way defending a pedophile tells you exactly where his thought process lies.
Nick, if you’re reading this, you’re a fucking wrong’un and a ****.
Nick if u r reading this I love u & think u r wonderful
That’s nice.Nick if u r reading this I love u & think u r wonderful
“Wrong ‘un and a” are totally superfluous in that sentence…He’s a bit fucking odd to say the least. Just catching up but on his tweettamajiggy he mentions that blues don’t like him because he gave evidence in the Bennel trial? Well for one I’ve hated the **** long before that and two, I had no idea he gave evidence so that has no bearing on me thinking he’s a ****. It’s his lack of integrity on any City related content he puts across and his long held dislike of our owners that made my mind up, nothing else. By trying to say we are in some way defending a pedophile tells you exactly where his thought process lies.
Nick, if you’re reading this, you’re a fucking wrong’un and a ****.
Cheers for that, I was having the same problem as tolmie.Click login and the click the close window X and your in.
Nick if u r reading this I love u & think u r wonderful
Strangely City's average in 1959-60 (35,637) was our highest since 1951-52 (38,302). However, this was undoubtedly inflated by the 65,981 who had attended the last game of the season v champions-elect BurnleyWhere do you source your data from moomey?
One thing notable about City's crowds is that we plunge in 1958?! It would be quite interesting to know what the impact was on Manchester City fans of the Munich Air disaster. I bet it was devastating. I've got a vague feeling I read something about this in Colin Schindlers Man Utd ruined my life.
Just like they gave Alan Smith after his red card for trying to break Richard Dunne’s ankle.Give the rags their dues I remember them giving him a standing ovation when he came off in that game
And Solskjaer after a professional foul v Newcastle as they tried to cheat their way to the title in 1998Just like they gave Alan Smith after his red card for trying to break Richard Dunne’s ankle.
Nick, I don't, you look like you stink of stale piss and touch yourself in an impure way when thinking about City.Nick if u r reading this I love u & think u r wonderful
I can't speak for where he got his from but the best source I've found, is european-football-statistics.Where do you source your data from moomey?
One thing notable about City's crowds is that we plunge in 1958?! It would be quite interesting to know what the impact was on Manchester City fans of the Munich Air disaster. I bet it was devastating. I've got a vague feeling I read something about this in Colin Schindlers Man Utd ruined my life.
Year | Villa in k | City in k | Villa Difference in k |
1959 | 33.88 | 32.568 | +1.312 |
1958 | 28.842 | 32.765 | -3.923 |
1957 | 30.487 | 30.005 | +0.482 |
1956 | 29.826 | 32.198 | -2.372 |
1955 | 29.578 | 35.217 | -5.639 |
1954 | 29.985 | 30.155 | -0.17 |
1953 | 32.189 | 34.058 | -1.869 |
1952 | 38.641 | 38.302 | +0.339 |
1951 | 38.369 | 35.016(Div2) | +3.353 |
1950 | 42.677 | 39.381 | +3.296 |
| Sum of Villa's average attendance difference for the decade in k | -5.191 |
Iirc @Gary James has said the City stats on that site aren’t accurate. Not sure to what level is ‘not accurate’. If they err on the side of understatement , then that’s fine.I can't speak for where he got his from but the best source I've found, is european-football-statistics.
Here is City's page:
Here is the main index for English football:
That's how I destroyed the Villa fan, by pointing out City's average was 5k higher, for the decade he was boasting about for Villa. I didn't want to argue with moomey but his charts are based off league attendances where the Villa fan was trying to focus on a few cup games(they actually set their club records in the 40s but I didn't tell the Villa fan that) My calculations for anyone interested:
Villa in k City in k Villa Difference in k 1959 33.88 32.568 +1.312 1958 28.842 32.765 -3.923 1957 30.487 30.005 +0.482 1956 29.826 32.198 -2.372 1955 29.578 35.217 -5.639 1954 29.985 30.155 -0.17 1953 32.189 34.058 -1.869 1952 38.641 38.302 +0.339 1951 38.369 35.016(Div2) +3.353 1950 42.677 39.381 +3.296
Sum of Villa's average attendance difference for the decade in k -5.191