I would be shocked if they don't double it after appealing!I'd be shocked if they reduce it.
I’d be more than happy with that. Without wanting to come across as arrogant, we should be ok without him against Sporting. But it would be a big loss if he can’t play in a tough QF first leg.My guess is that it will be reduced to two which hopefully we can live with
Iirc Wan Bissaka's was a really bad tackle but not malicious, whereas Walker's wasn't too bad a tackle but obviously he had bad intent.Didn’t Wan Bissaka get a three match ban for a similar tackle? Think that was reduced to two on appeal
Wan-Bissaka’s ban was two games, reduced to one on appeal.Didn’t Wan Bissaka get a three match ban for a similar tackle? Think that was reduced to two on appeal
Were you on the panel? What happened?Title should read, appeal rejected pg 14.
UEFA took one look at the players club and doubled the ban to 6 games.Were you on the panel? What happened?
Didn’t Wan Bissaka get a three match ban for a similar tackle? Think that was reduced to two on appeal
They haven’t, have they?UEFA took one look at the players club and doubled the ban to 6 games.
Yeah, but he's a rag.Didn’t Wan Bissaka get a three match ban for a similar tackle? Think that was reduced to two on appeal
It’s possible, but I think the fact it was deliberate meant it was more likely to stay at 3 games.I wonder if they’d have reduced it to 2 if the 2nd leg wasn’t a dead rubber… which would effectively have made it a 1 game ban