Kippaxpete
Well-Known Member
It's none of your fucking business pal. I wasn't the hypocrite claiming to be desperate to take in a refugee family.Is your house full and if so who is there?
It's none of your fucking business pal. I wasn't the hypocrite claiming to be desperate to take in a refugee family.Is your house full and if so who is there?
How many are you taking in?
Bosphorus strait?.......major shipping route in and out of the Black Sea......Turkey have close ties with Russia though,don't they?
I understand your reluctance to elaborate mate. I really do.Ergh yeh OK, I'm sure your right.
Well done.
Not just nukes but he could attack a nato country or a nato supply run. See what developsWhy fuck? That Dodgy dwarf over in the east has been promising to nuke anything that walks for about the last 15 years and hasn't done so yet. I don't think old Vlad will either. Just my opinion.
@spectatorindex: BREAKING: Moscow says countries sending military equipment to Ukraine will be responsible if they are used against Russian forces.
Please explain, I am sooooo interested to hear what you have to say about me.It's none of your fucking business pal. I wasn't the hypocrite claiming to be desperate to take in a refugee family.
Hiroshima
![]()
Nagasaki
![]()
The point IS not to suggest these bombs aren't still devastating or destructive, OR that we can simply "brush off" their usage. I hope they're never used as the cost will be unbearable. But the narrative that it'll be "armaggeddon" is a little misplaced. This isn't the 80's, things have changed, most nukes are low yield now with reduced capability to create fallout.
Plus there are fewer of them, we have better detection and capacity to destroy them once launched, with multiple sites across Europe. Russia now has too many targets, with too few nukes that would survive being shot down by even more sites capable of doing so and having been detected much earlier.
Yes, the ones that would get through would be catastrophic; but the world survived Nakasaki and Hiroshima and they rebuilt. In the 80's it didn't look like we would survive M.A.D., today it's a different story. The whole point is NOT to spread fear. We already know they should never be used, scaring people as to their destructive power, when we already know it, helps nobody. I've seen the Tsar Bomba used as an example of the Russian Nuclear Capability many, many times. The fact is they don't have anything close to that anymore.
It would appear hateutd is fully invested in the fact that the Azov battalion (far right nasty fucking nazi pricks), and by extension the Azov movement (right wing political movement), are controlling Zelensky.Rather than calling you a complete fucking noodle can you please explain your comments a bit more.
Elaborate on what ?I understand your reluctance to elaborate mate. I really do.
I still have no idea what he’s planning on doing with it, he can’t keep it and if he changes regime we’ll be back where he was before this at the following election.There is a significant escalation in Russian aggression this evening and it looks like they are preparing a siege of Kyiv. I just can't see how this ends now? Putin will not back down from here for the fear of looking weak and I can't see Ukraine holding out for much longer.
At some point Russia are going to cross another line, be it killing the Ukrainian President or completely flattening Ukrainian cities. At this point, what do the west do? What further levers do we have?
The only way this ends is if the Russian overthrow Putin. Surely there must be significant portion of the Russian population that sees that if they were brought in from the cold their country would be very prosperous given the natural resources they have.
but Russia don’t win from the wests actions, I reckon he’d rather call it a draw and fuck everyoneLike a rat backed into a corner if he's got nothing to lose he's such an egotistical psychopath he'd start a nuclear war. I'm amazed his own generals haven't had a coup and removed the lunatic as nobody wins from his actions, nobody.
I read that as wheelchair warriors at first. Carry on.This is about Ukraine. Perhaps you should be in the politics section of off top with all the other armchair warriors.... sorry firebrands
@spectatorindex: BREAKING: Moscow says countries sending military equipment to Ukraine will be responsible if they are used against Russian forces.
The question I asked. You swerved it.Elaborate on what ?
I understand your reluctance to elaborate mate. I really do.
Leave it out you pair of last word merchants, it's like every thread has got one or the other of you nit picking about something or other, fucking boring cunts.Please explain, I am sooooo interested to hear what you have to say about me.
Who's ships are they blocking ?Turkey blocking military ships now.
Just make sure you aren't leaving reviews for restaurants in Moscow, Idaho (which is happening).
That would bring in the whole of NATO and that is a war Putin is definitely not ready for.Not just nukes but he could attack a nato country or a nato supply run. See what develops
Range 13 at ADX Super Max Florence Colorado. Clean version of hell.Don’t the US, the leading NATO member, have a prison where people are thrown in and tortured without charge?
I’m very much in favour of NATO and this week has shown it’s benefits, but I doubt that will stop them getting entry.