Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not much for the "game theory conspiracy hunting" kind but I do think it's interesting quite a lot of madrid sources have come out yesterday and today with a message saying "they are checking haaland's injury record".

On the one hand, it doesn't seem like they're angling for a "and that's why they didnt sign him because hes an injury risk" as most of the stuff i've seen says they think his injuries are not serious.

But it is kind of a weird angle to all start parroting at the same time
 
samuelyeboah said:
I am not much for the "game theory conspiracy hunting" kind but I do think it's interesting quite a lot of madrid sources have come out yesterday and today with a message saying "they are checking haaland's injury record".

On the one hand, it doesn't seem like they're angling for a "and that's why they didnt sign him because hes an injury risk" as most of the stuff i've seen says they think his injuries are not serious.

But it is kind of a weird angle to all start parroting at the same time
Click to expand...
Yup they’ll use the “we don’t want another Hazard” excuse
 
samuelyeboah said:
I am not much for the "game theory conspiracy hunting" kind but I do think it's interesting quite a lot of madrid sources have come out yesterday and today with a message saying "they are checking haaland's injury record".

On the one hand, it doesn't seem like they're angling for a "and that's why they didnt sign him because hes an injury risk" as most of the stuff i've seen says they think his injuries are not serious.

But it is kind of a weird angle to all start parroting at the same time
Click to expand...
No player can ever possibly reject them, as you know… It has to be their choice to walk away

Some of the reports from yesterday claiming the club had JUST made a decision to sign him were quite hilarious as well, considering the same outlet had reported several different agreements the past few months.
 
If his wages story is true? Pinch of salt.

The 'Scousers', Rags, and football fans in general are going mad in the comments section under the article.

Beautiful!
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the April 30th deadline is true. There has always been a lot of confusion in regards to the timeline of the release clause. It also ties in with the sudden rush for his signature and constant news. There was also that report from Keegan saying City expect to know within a month.
 
kupest said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the April 30th deadline is true. There has always been a lot of confusion in regards to the timeline of the release clause. It also ties in with the sudden rush for his signature and constant news. There was also that report from Keegan saying City expect to know within a month.
Click to expand...
It reminds me of the confusion regarding the date Messi was supposed to send the Burofax. Lol
 
Why would you have a release clause that changed / expired in the middle of a season? Makes no sense, all that does is cause disruption / confusion right in the middle of a campaign.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
They play Bayern away on 23rd April.......doubt they would want to unsettle him and the rest by announcing something before that game.....maybe 30th is correct?
Click to expand...
You think they set this date thinking of when they would be facing Bayern in the Bundesliga? Doesn’t sound plausible to me. And he wouldn’t need to deny it if it were the case
 
BrazilianBlue (Gus) said:
You think they set this date thinking of when they would be facing Bayern in the Bundesliga? Doesn’t sound plausible to me. And he wouldn’t need to deny it if it were the case
Click to expand...
No I don't think that......maybe someone trying to unsettle them near that game.....hence Jan coming out saying it's bollocks....dunno.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top