It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread

kaz7 said:
Why would we possibly sell zinchy ? Low wages , well loved , good player , madness
Click to expand...
I think he might want to go to a club where he can play more. Right now, I can’t see it happening with what is happening in Ukraine.
 
Disgusting deal for football this. £1.4b over 10 years, sport washing at its finest.

What will you do when he can only play 4 games a season and needs life changing surgery on his uneven leg lengths in 3 years

Waste of money. You should get Puma to pay for the deal, so he plays for free like Nike are doing with taking Mbappe to Liverpool. If it wasnt about money he would do it for free.
 
Cobwebcat said:
Another 100 million and the Midfielder is more expensive than FDJ Tolmie says.

2 players probably a young right back and a midfielder in other reports.

So the midfielder is around 70 mill leaving 30 mill for the right back.

Melting the internet could just be the fact that we are buying more players rather than who it is,or what club they are at so I’ll ignore that bit.

Bellingham not available until next year.

Hmmmmm….

Davies and Kimmich at Bayern for 100 million. I read somewhere they were after cash.

Haha can you imagine? We would have the best team of all time.
Click to expand...
Veratti although his age may be an issue
 
BlueLou82 said:
Disgusting deal for football this. £1.4b over 10 years, sport washing at its finest.

What will you do when he can only play 4 games a season and needs life changing surgery on his uneven leg lengths in 3 years

Waste of money. You should get Puma to pay for the deal, so he plays for free like Nike are doing with taking Mbappe to Liverpool. If it wasnt about money he would do it for free.
Click to expand...
We don’t need Puma to pay for him, the Sheikh will just get another of his companies to over pay to be our official vermicelli partner to finance the deal, like he’s done since 2008.

Or maybe we just use the Torres money.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
We don’t need Puma to pay for him, the Sheikh will just get another of his companies to over pay to be our official vermicelli partner to finance the deal, like he’s done since 2008.

Or maybe we just use the Torres money.
Click to expand...

It was a piss take mate, at all the criticism thrown your way for having the audacity to sign one of the worlds best young players for a cheap deal. See the Telegraph deciced to run with the overall figure of the deal including wages etc- never seen that before.
 
domalino said:
Yeah because clubs always give out massive contracts to players they don't use for 4 months at a time.

They're both in identical situations, rejecting contracts for their own career flexibility, only one of them gets abuse for it.
Click to expand...

They are not the same situations though, at least as far as we know.

We don't know what Jesus is being offered, if anything. And both his initial fee and the wages package so far are far less so it is less of a return to protect.

Saying that, I agree with you entirely, no need to single out Sterling for refusing a contract at all. But I fully see why people would rather he was sold rather than Jesus.
 
Coatigan said:
We don't know what Jesus is being offered, if anything. And both his initial fee and the wages package so far are far less so it is less of a return to protect.
Click to expand...

The difference in intial fee is a weird thing to bring up. £44m 7 years ago (£6.2m/year) vs. Jesus' £28m 5 years ago (£5.6m/year)...no one gives a shit about that.

We know Jesus wants £240k/week from Arsenal, I doubt he's demanding less from City.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top