Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
@jimharri @MCFC1993

Can we please rename this one or call the next one "Liverpool - The Fourgettables!"




On RAWK we're - "Man City - the Lisbon Lyons, the Porto Pussycats, the Bernabeu Bottlers"


I dont see why not? Apologies if you've already answered this but I didnt see a reply

Here’s a few….

“Never their fault”

“Blame it on the migrants”

“Blags for sale”
 
One of many classics on the RAWK, City thread.

Their plan will be that he helps them finally win the CL and then they'll allow him to sign for Real Madrid. Which is what he had his heart set on doing in the first place.
 
And yet, on the BBC’s rolling football news page, more people think Nuñez will be better value for Littlewoods than Erling will be for us.

Make of that what you will.
Well Charlie Adam was a much better investment than a certain Mr Aguero. Honest.
 
Seemingly it's not hypocrisy on Klub shops part we have all missed the fact of the Coutinho money funding all club activities for ever.
It is quite astonishing ignorance to try and claim that had anything to do with his comments - it was nothing to do with players sales, and all to do with putting your eggs in a £100m basket.

Still, a football journalist who cannot understand that in season that Liverpool sold Coutinho, Man City freed up more money in their budget by selling Kolarov, Cliche, Sagna, Zabaleta, Nasri, Bony, Iheanacho, Fernando, Caballero, Navas etc., shouldn't be allowed near any kind of newspaper.
 
Still, a football journalist who cannot understand that in season that Liverpool sold Coutinho, Man City freed up more money in their budget by selling Kolarov, Cliche, Sagna, Zabaleta, Nasri, Bony, Iheanacho, Fernando, Caballero, Navas etc., shouldn't be allowed near any kind of newspaper.
Oh, they understand alright. They understand perfectly well. Their problem is their refusal to acknowledge it.
 
Oh, they understand alright. They understand perfectly well. Their problem is their refusal to acknowledge it.
I genuinely think they don't.

The net spend thing is so "simple" to understand, and many footballers and journalist aren't that inquisitive.

"Klopp's" net sales include almost £150m MORE then City have raised from players who were at the club before he arrived. He had a young squad with a higher resale value.
City's squad has approx 6-8 senior players LESS on the books than when Pep arrived, yet Liverpool's squad is the same size. That's a saving of £50-80m a year.
 
One of many classics on the RAWK, City thread.

Their plan will be that he helps them finally win the CL and then they'll allow him to sign for Real Madrid. Which is what he had his heart set on doing in the first place.
Even if it were true, when we make 100 mill on the deal their heads will explode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top