From current rail staff?Where would they come from? Thought we were world leading in full employment.
Was there no room in the fridge?View attachment 47853Seems to be a recurring theme!
I think you'll find agency staff may be paid less. It just costs the employer more.From current rail staff?
Leave and get a higher rate of pay via agency?
Of course only in the short-term, and with zero job security, and zero benefits such as pension and sick pay and holiday pay and ...
They'll be counting on enough taking the Queen's shilling to make it viable.
They will pay more to entice qualified people away from rail companies, especially if they can leave and get a redundancy package.I think you'll find agency staff may be paid less. It just costs the employer more.
Agency work is never cheaper for the employer.They will pay more to entice qualified people away from rail companies, especially if they can leave and get a redundancy package.
Higher pay from the agency dressed up as skills premium, probably only in the short-term.
The agencies costs will be lower as they don't have the same overheads on employees.
The price will be slightly lower given all factors such as not carrying absence costs through holidays and sick.
To be straight, it is not my preferred option but how I can see it being mapped out / spun in the media.
Same staff provided by an agency at a lower overall cost.
The likes of Serco and Capita are the ones to watch.
Agency work is never cheaper for the employer.
Of course but they’d be better off having them on zero hour contracts than through an agency, wouldn’t they?He said lower overall cost. Keeping terms and conditions down and getting rid of things like sick pay and notices. No need to pay someone when there isn't much work on.
Of course but they’d be better off having them on zero hour contracts than through an agency, wouldn’t they?
Absolute danger to women, anyone that holds these views shouldn't be an MP in this country.
I’ve put us up to take one of those families. Council got in touch, explained the situation etc so there is some proactive action happening. I appreciate you wanted to score some political points there mate but just wanted to say they aren’t sleeping in shop doorways and, as a country, councils are trying to sort it. Reasons are mostly location doesn’t work or people volunteered to house them for, let’s say, questionable reasons.
The government should have done way more in supporting the process of matching volunteers with refugees of that there is no doubt. It’s been a shambles, no other way to describe it.
It was difficult for them - they wanted to APPEAR to be doing something to please some voters and APPEAR to be doing nothing to appease the others - looks like they managed it
Think the tweet is in relation to the guy who stands in Parliament Square and shouts very loudly. The law change came in today and he had a swarm of coppers surround him and confiscate his megaphone.Weird.
Some guy on the BBC politics show earlier today mentioned Brexit and this was immediately laughed off and brushed aside rather hastily.
It's become akin to showing a man's erection on television.
Aye, I saw the post/video earlier.Think the tweet is in relation to the guy who stands in Parliament Square and shouts very loudly. The law change came in today and he had a swarm of coppers surround him and confiscate his megaphone.
It’s too soon to talk about it.Aye, I saw the post/video earlier.
Just meant that particular word sounds off more than sirens now. Shut's down BBC conversations and now protestors by the sounds of it. It's gone taboo like 'alan' and stiffies on TV (at least terrestrial TV...).
Haha.It’s too soon to talk about it.
We’re in the thoughts and prayers stage at the moment.
Weird.
Some guy on the BBC politics show earlier today mentioned Brexit and this was immediately laughed off and brushed aside rather hastily.
It's become akin to showing a man's erection on television.