Bernardo Silva

Status
Not open for further replies.
What player do you swap considering de Jong is on ridiculous wages as it is and wouldn't want to drop too much salary?
The only player they want is Bernardo. The wages might not be an issue if Barca pay what is owed. I would take it if the deal is offered.
 
He won’t want to take a wage cut and his current wages would disrupt our current structure (even if the Bernardo money would subsidise the new expense), so I can’t see it happening.

Not to mention there is no guarantee Barca can even meet any financial obligations for a Bernardo transfer.
We’d have to front or backload his salary to keep within our weekly structure.
 
The only player they want is Bernardo. The wages might not be an issue if Barca pay what is owed. I would take it if the deal is offered.
We would still have to cough up de Jong's wages if you are considering a swap for the two. And if it was just cash they don't have the immediate funds to make the purchase
 
It’s how we would do it if we wanted him.
I don‘t think we want him enough to do that, as it is not as if our other players (and more importantly their agents) would not be aware of that manoeuvring. It would cause nearly the same disruption.
 
We would still have to cough up de Jong's wages if you are considering a swap for the two. And if it was just cash they don't have the immediate funds to make the purchase
Barca would have to supplement his wages. Perfect deal for city. I would rather we swap now than Barca making a late bid and leaving us looking for a replacement.
 
Barca would have to supplement his wages. Perfect deal for city. I would rather we swap now than Barca making a late bid and leaving us looking for a replacement.
Not in their current state. They want him completely off their books.
 
Haaland is one of the most prized signings in half a decade, perhaps a generational talent with the right coaching, gives everyone at the club a positive jolt/buzz, had a relatively low buyout clause (which would mean a decent sign-on bonus is very likely), and was not a haphazard makeweight transfer to make up for losing one of the most well-liked and respected players at the club.

They are nowhere near the same players, nor the same situation, and will be viewed very differently amongst the playing staff and their representatives.
 
Haaland is one of the most prized signings in half a decade, perhaps a generational talent with the right coaching, gives everyone at the club a positive jolt, had a relatively low buyout clause (which would mean a decent sign-on bonus is very likely), and was not a haphazard makeweight transfer to make up for losing one of the most well-liked and respected players at the club.
That wouldn’t mean much when it comes to players asking for more money.
 
That wouldn’t mean much when it comes to players asking for more money.
It absolutely would. One is seen as an absolute coup by City (both inside and outside of the club), the other as a panic deal still being compensated similarly.

There is no way that Haaland’s and De Jong’s transfer — under the perimeters you and I are discussing — would be viewed the same way by the players and their agents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kun
It absolutely would. One is seen as an absolute coup by City (both inside and outside of the club), the other as a panic deal still being compensated similarly.

There is no way that Haaland’s and De Jong’s transfer — under the perimeters you and I are discussing — would be viewed the same way by the players and their agents.
If it gave them an avenue to ask for more money, they’d absolutely take it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top