Bluemoonie92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 8,491
Gleeson can be really good or really bad. Them last 3 balls were shocking
Was he told to go for the yorker first ball? Fine margins at this level, he could have been the hero.Gleeson enters the Hall of Shame. Terrible bowling at the death.
Oo errGleeson has had an absolute mare, three dreadful balls
Trent somebody……mate of Jermaine Jenas…Out of interest who came up with the crap names for the teams in the 100
I don’t mind watching it myself. Wouldn’t pay to go see it at the ground though.Thank goodness that abomination is over.
Manchester Originals is probably the cringiest of the lot, agreed they are shocking namesTrent somebody……mate of Jermaine Jenas…
Or the BBC. Names are really crap. As bad as Rugby League.
Competition needs “ Scottish Angry Cunts” to give it some beef……Manchester Originals is probably the cringiest of the lot, agreed they are shocking names
Would you put yourself forward as captain?Competition needs “ Scottish Angry Cunts” to give it some beef……
Only qualify on two…….One is Scottish.Would you put yourself forward as captain?
Do you self-identify as tetchy?Only qualify on two…….One is Scottish.
Match or competition ?Thank goodness that abomination is over.
It’s not just that, but that’s a huge issue.Match or competition ?
I've hardly seen a ball of it, cricket didn't need a rewrite, it has been perfectly good in numerous formats of 6 ball overs.
Somebody made the point earlier in the thread, imagine Phil Foden playing for Leeds against Manchester, no I can't either, load of shite.
What’s your fucking problem pal… Who you calling ‘tetchy’ and WTF does it mean?? Good job I’m not angry.Do you self-identify as tetchy?