BlueMonkey79
Well-Known Member
With the introduction of VAR it is a manipulators wet dream to massage results to the "preffered" team.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United (A) | Post Match Thread
- Thread starter MCFC1993
- Start date
But surely, you go again to win it or get a draw. Mentality has to be right.
you lose the plot ? no amount of training and talking in the week about not losing your cool can change the fact the worst bit of cheating ever simple
Allnightlong
Well-Known Member
thought process.....he dummies and therefore makes eddy look at him....its not just the defenders. eddy didnt know who was going to shoot.How does it impact their ability to play the ball? They were nowhere near the ball
The Colonel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,265
No discussion on BT of the impact Rashford being on the ball had on Eddy’s positioning. He’s set for a left footed shot, playing to the flag. Bent bastards.
bluesince76
Well-Known Member
How? Ederson didn't try to. That would be because he'd expect Rashford to shoot, but it didn't actually stop him. If Rashford ran into Ederson as he tried to clear it, he'd have been offside.That last one surely?
Rashford running with the ball (even doing a feint at one point) clearly affects Ederson's ability to play the ball??
Bizarrely, if Akanji had brought him down, that would have been a foul on Rashford as it would have occurred before the offside! The whole rule is a joke
Rashford ran 20 yards to deliberately and intentionally position himself between Akanje and the football. There is no provision within the rules for that goal to be allowed. City need to publicly demand an explanation from the FA.Eddie and Akanji think Rashford is still in play, so they move towards him - therefore Rashford influenced play illegally in an offside position - aka interfered with play = no goal.
I think Grealish besides the goal did play quite well in carrying the ball through midfield and evading challenges. It's one of those moments though where the decision of only one of him and Foden being on the pitch makes the attack a little too one paced in order to chase a game. Due to the fact Mahrez and Bernardo both take a lot of touches on the ball to shift it out whereas Foden quickly moves it on.
blueju
Well-Known Member
Ederson was only concentrating on Rashford, is that enough impact?How does it impact their ability to play the ball? They were nowhere near the ball
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
There is a pattern, Arsenal on top and get a perfectly good goal ruled out at OT. United go on to win with an offside goal. Ditto v Liverpool at the swamp , a miles offside Rashford seals the game. Rules are rules*What's the point in even trying anymore. The fuckers don't even try to hide the corruption at this point. Don't stand a chance. That was a fucking disgrace today
*except for yoonitid
They were given a helping hand (especially with the opening goal). This is without my blue glasses on.We are shit at the moment and I can’t see that changing anytime soon. The first half was dire. Giving up a 1-0 lead too is rank
C
C
Cricket Blue
Guest
Sadly the attitude and desire has gone but it's hard when every game your playing against 12 men.
simon23
Well-Known Member
Read he law here:That last one surely?
Rashford running with the ball (even doing a feint at one point) clearly affects Ederson's ability to play the ball??
- a player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball; if the player moves into the way of an opponent and impedes the opponent's progress (e.g blocks the opponent) the offence should be penalised under Law 12
Where the rule is wrong is that he impacts on decision making....but the rule above seems to only take account for physical actions
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 13,417
- Team supported
- City
Turned it off, what did he say?Again, did you see the interview? Because he went on to clarify that comment.
CambridgeExileBlue
Well-Known Member
Best bit of sarcasm of the day so far.I think we were fantastic. We deserved to win today. Give the team some credit, they were excellent.
We were awful.
Can't beleive how quick they over turned the on field decision. For such a controversial goal.. Very bias. Imo you have to ask a couple questions. 1. Who was the pass intended for ? Rashford. So straight away he's changed defenders mindset and is the main threat and not Bruno. 2. Does Bruno score if rashford isn't involved in that phase of play? I don't think he does.. I don't even think he touches the ball without rashford guarding it and putting defenders and goalkeeper off.
Brightwell Bros.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 8,624
That's the key point. Forget posting the laws of the game, you're disadvantaging the defender who has done their job. It's as simple as that. It's as clear as day to anyone who has played or watched football. Akanji did his job that he has trained every day of his life to do.Also Akanji just said he played Rashford offside, so from that point onwards when Rashford moved towards the ball Rashford was interfering with the play. Akanji was disadvantaged because of playing him offside.
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
Fuck off RAGPrick!
yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
somewhere in the world a tree is working so fucking hard to produce oxygen so you can breathe, I think it only right that you hunt worldwide for said tree and tell it to stop wasting it's time.I'm not a Haaland fan in fact i think he's set us back with his 0 touches every damn game
It's always been corrupt, even pre var they gave these lot fergie time and penalties on a weekly basisThe PL is corrupt from top to bottom, especially since the introduction of VAR.