Ref Watch

i didn't see the game because i was working, however i have seen the goals , when rashford is played through he goes towards the ball, that action alone is offside ,has the ball under control without touching it doesn't matter he is offside still, he then sort of shimmies, so he makes an action towards the ball,so offside again , he could clearly be given offside 3 times , the fact he doesn't touch the ball is neither here or there ,
 
Once upon a time it was deemed to be a foul to shout "leave it" to an opponent to gain an advantage. No physicality involved just intent.
 
Gundogan's Moustache said:
The premier league need to come out and explain how Rashford isn’t interfering.

if they do this ill take it on the chin but they won’t cause

1. They’re fucking corrupt
2. it doesn’t fit the narrative
Click to expand...
They could explain it,but it’ll be some silly bollocks to explain it away,it’ll happen again then if it’s ruled out that’s the time to call into play corruption and cheating,as they have moved the goalposts to suit a narrative..
 
trublue55 said:
The laws do not say he isn't, they are sufficiently vague to allow interpretation . Unfortunately (allegedly) VAR could not get involved as it was a subjective decision.

Equally unfortunately it would appear, bearing in mind the lino flagged, that only Twatwell (how he ever got another game after the ghost goal), rag fans and YOU, think he was onside!
Click to expand...
Absolutely agree that they are vague...they need to be changed and simplified......If you are in the attacking half you are interfeering with play....real easy..all players have to be onside in the attacking half at al times....

As Ivesaid they imply physicality with words such as
Moves into the way of an opponent...Now does that mean deliberate obstuction or what rashford does as he wasnt holding the player off player
Impedes progress - does he physically stop anyone from playing (or attempting to play) the ball.....no...
interfering with an opponent by:
  • preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
  • challenging an opponent for the ball or
  • clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent
Rashford does none of these. he is not obstructing anyones view, he hasnt challenged anyone and he makes no attempt to play the ball

Most decisions (besides whether the ball crosses the goal line or not) are subjective.
 
Gundogan's Moustache said:
The premier league need to come out and explain how Rashford isn’t interfering.

if they do this ill take it on the chin but they won’t cause

1. They’re fucking corrupt
2. it doesn’t fit the narrative
Click to expand...

spot on

when the officials make a so-called mistake, nothing is said for weeks and weeks, then they say a mistake was made and it's part of the learn curve, but making this look like a mistake will take years, because it was not a mistake but clear and obvious CHEATING
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.