flb
Well-Known Member
We are 100% innocent or not mate , 90 doesn’t do it , does it really ?
We are 100% innocent or not mate , 90 doesn’t do it , does it really ?
Pinto hacked someones emails on the financial side at City , it wasn’t the info@mancity.com page he got into about “my dog is a city fan” can I have a signed shirt.What guy whose emails were hacked?
They didn't hack the emails of one person, they hacked the servers which is how they got 5.5million emails and documents.Does Khaldoon sign the actual conformation of audit? Or is it /was it down to someone he trusted , I’m not being funny here but he’s trusting other people in certain departments, he’s a man of the utmost integrity, but his employees are on the gravy train just like in any other company aren’t they? The guy whose emails were hacked , does he still work at the club ?
You do know that once a hacker a past your security, they can get pretty much anywhere on your network if you have the time & skills right?Pinto hacked someones emails on the financial side at City , it wasn’t the info@mancity.com page he got into about “my dog is a city fan” can I have a signed shirt.
What did we ever do to deserve all this shit that's been thrown at us the last few years?
I agree , so why are our emails standing out is all I’m saying .They didn't hack the emails of one person, they hacked the servers which is how they got 5.5million emails and documents.
Including my dog is a city fan , I agreeYou do know that once a hacker a past your security, they can get pretty much anywhere on your network if you have the time & skills right?
Pretty certain it was our email server which got hacked, so Pinto would’ve had access to ALL of the clubs emails
No, it is an English company governed by English law.I believe that we do and I believe that there would be a US case to answer if it is proven we falsified our accounts, although @projectriver can confirm that.
Agreed, The slur won’t go away, but your posts imply that if we get any fine, that means we’re guilty, which is an incorrect assumptionWhat’s the fine for? Non cooperation or withholding the truth? Listen mate , I’m on the clubs side , the slur will never go away based on a fine.
In an ideal world that would be great. Black and white, right or wrong. Most of this fight will be down to interpretation of the irrefutable material. Point after point will be contested. Based on what we know and the interpretion of said law from experienced posters on here.I hope so mate , I just don’t like the obvious nervousness of our fans on here who have a legal grasp or financial acumen, not one has said we are 100% innocent , it’s all about getting away with this on a technicality. We will always be chests in the eyes of everyone, and the press will continue to go to town on us , we are either 100% innocent or not . Rant over !
As @Centurions has said, he didn't hack an individual's email, so you calling for that individuals head is a bit out of orderPinto hacked someones emails on the financial side at City , it wasn’t the info@mancity.com page he got into about “my dog is a city fan” can I have a signed shirt.
You agree with what? You seemed to think it was one person who got hacked?I agree , so why are our emails standing out is all I’m saying .
Who gives an absolute flying fuck about “the slur”? Let them call us whatever the fuck they want.What’s the fine for? Non cooperation or withholding the truth? Listen mate , I’m on the clubs side , the slur will never go away based on a fine.
That's what the idiots on Twitter repeat ad nauseum, "you paid a fine so you must be guilty".Agreed, The slur won’t go away, but your posts imply that if we get any fine, that means we’re guilty, which is an incorrect assumption
Do you know what information we’ve withheld? If not, you’re gonna tie yourself up in knots over something you know nowt about mate
I’m of the opinion mate that they have something on us, is the guy named (because he was) still employed by the club? Listen mate , I agree with you , but come on , something isn’t right , and it’s down to hacked emails , surely you can see that?You agree with what? You seemed to think it was one person who got hacked?
I just don't understand the rest of your post here. Standing out from what?