Looby blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 417
- Team supported
- Manchester
The presenting football highlights show lane.What lane should he stay in?
The presenting football highlights show lane.What lane should he stay in?
Would that be the same impartial BBC whose chair is the Tory donor Richard Sharp?Look peeps, it simple...
Had Linekar said this whilst employed by only Sky, BT Sport etc, they'd be no issue.
Buuuuuuuuuut, he IS employed by the BBC, a taxpayer funded institution that expects all its representatives, in every form of media, to be impartial. Its no different to bringing the company you work for into disrepute for comments made on social media. Of course he's entitled to his opinion, but not whilst employed by an impartial, taxpayer funded institution.
Agree or disagree with his comments makes no difference here. He is representing the BBC, which is not meant to have any opinion for or against due to the nature of how it is funded, otherwise the 'impartial BBC' would be accused and seen as siding with a particular point of view, which it's not allowed to. He's broken that commitment and so is being "spoken to".
If anyone has any issues with any BBC representative for their comments, Kuenssberg, Bruce, et al, you have to make those complaints, not expect the BBC to take action themselves. And remember, there are no 'free speech laws' in the UK.
That is horseshit and you know it.So complain about them. Highlight the comments, gain enough complaints (100,000 usually does the trick) to have an MP raise the issue with the BBC Director General and the BBC will then take action.
That's all that's happened here.
He chose to go down the Nazi/Holocaust route, always a bad move that never ends well and maybe now he'll think before he goes trawling for likes and retweets.
#Stayinyourlane
Nice rebuttal.It's obviously not that simple because you are wrong.
There are enough lady presenters to fill the spots of the old boys throwing a tantrum.
The very same!Would that be the same impartial BBC whose chair is the Tory donor Richard Sharp?
Yeah, because the Tories are in government and in charge of the BBC funding, something they don't want to see reduced which the Tories have the power to do so.That is horseshit and you know it.
They've taken him off air for one reason and one reason only - the Tories wanted it.
So you're accepting the tories are in favour of stopping freedom of speech. It's fucking disgusting.Yeah, because the Tories are in government and in charge of the BBC funding, something they don't want to see reduced which the Tories have the power to do so.
It isn't rocket science.
And then you'll have the old boys refusing to watch women commentators on a man's game throwing tantrums.
love it - can I get a Shitfest '23 teeshirt?It's a shitfest.
Nope. The BBC have acted upon the whims of complaints raised by MP's made by one of their representatives which has an agreement in place to be impartial in all forms of media whilst in their employ, whose wages are paid for by the taxpayer that expect such impartiality.So you're accepting the tories are in favour of stopping freedom of speech. It's fucking disgusting.
No.Nope. The BBC have acted upon the whims of complaints raised by MP's made by one of their representatives which has an agreement in place to be impartial in all forms of media whilst in their employ and paid for by the taxpayer.
I'm guessing you're of the "BBC are far-right Tory enablers" persuasion?
Really from who? The BBC have just said he broke impartiality guidelines , t looks very much like he's lost his job because of his own stupidity and arrogance. Tbh I can't stand him on MOTD. So I am a little biased.
Vague.