PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Pep's team selection plus our deadbeat performance didn't need any help from corruption.
I put a comment in the Ref watch thread this morning about that. I think Pep's team selection was directly because Lahoz was appointed referee. He didn't play a DM for the only time ever, because he feared Ferny or Gundogan, would receive 2 yellows from Lahoz. This couldn't be reviewed by VAR. I put the blame on UEFA for appointing such an official with extensive high profile history against Pep!
 
I put a comment in the Ref watch thread this morning about that. I think Pep's team selection was directly because Lahoz was appointed referee. He didn't play a DM for the only time ever, because he feared Ferny or Gundogan, would receive 2 yellows from Lahoz. This couldn't be reviewed by VAR. I put the blame on UEFA for appointing such an official with extensive high profile history against Pep!
You don't think Pep could have told Fernandinho to be careful and avoid getting sent off?
 
Any chance we can get back on topic mods, i have just wasted ten mins wading through refs are bent shit when there are other threads for that , thanks

Quite right.

And as a public service for those who don't like to waste their time, I have the latest news on the PL investigation: there isn't any and won't be for months.

Happy to help.
 
Any chance we can get back on topic mods, i have just wasted ten mins wading through refs are bent shit when there are other threads for that , thanks
This thread should be put to bed until we get anything tangible about the result. Until then it will mirror the CAS one and head off in various directions with the odd abusive post.
 
Personally, and from a psychological point of view, I think it's fascinating how a thread like this can wander from issue to issue over a few months. Let it live its own life. The poor thing isn't hurting anyone :)

And the last ten pages of conspiracy are better than the first ten pages of utter desperation, imho.
Its gone from a thread of interesting points of view from quite knowledgeable people.... To John Stones is a cheat.

np with that, just having to read some of the tin pot shite to get to the informative stuff. Ah well.
 
I don't see it as a problem. Just an observation.

We all know why the charges were made and theories that follow. It just mirrors that thread imo.

Fair enough, the discussions have pretty much been done to death based on what we think we know, that's true. But I can still enjoy how a thread wends to its conclusion.

I just have more of a thing about people saying close thread, back on topic mods, or, in your case, put the thread to bed. Don't know why really, just seems like they are telling other people what to do.

Nothing personal.
 
Fair enough, the discussions have pretty much been done to death based on what we think we know, that's true. But I can still enjoy how a thread wends to its conclusion.

I just have more of a thing about people saying close thread, back on topic mods, or, in your case, put the thread to bed. Don't know why really, just seems like they are telling other people what to do.

Nothing personal.
Mods and ric have said back on topic for much less than this , it is irritating to have to plough through shit to get any info on this important subject when there is the refs and var and more threads for discussing pigmol
 
I'm watching Lord Pannick as Boris Johnson is answering questions in the Privileges Committee. He's desperately trying to maintain a poker face, but must be thinking that MCFC will prove much easier to direct as a client.
 
Screenshot_20230322-155315_Chrome.jpg
According to this report, UEFA are now looking at allowing multi-club ownership, just 4 weeks after saying the model threatens the integrity of European competitions. They now apparently believe it'll have no material effect on European matches.

The sudden about turn has absolutely nothing to do with the Qataris who already own PSG looking to buy ManUre, & who have their man on the UEFA board.

Cynical me.... :-/

https://www.footballinsider247.com/...cope-as-details-of-uefa-ban-revealed-sources/
 
Yeah i am glued to him and his sly smiles , must be thinking what a twat
This part about kangaroo Court is interesting and shows why its not a good idea to question the panel.
Good opportunity to see what I assume Citys hearing will be like.
As for Pannick, he looks sly, maybe not the best term, confident maybe , gives away a lot in his gestures.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top