cleavers
Moderator
bbc report made £7.2m in 5 years, other members 3-5 years in prison.
I think it’s the profiteering rather than the piracy that’s got them in bother. Like fake designer goods, this sort of thing does fund organised crime.Corporate justice over people justice as usual.
In the eyes of the law they are and have been found guilty. Maybe a bit naive here but I'd prefer our underfunded police forces to put murderers, rapists, and nonces behind bars than protect an already corporate rich organisation.
Thank you for that. Changes my perspective on it.I think it’s the profiteering rather than the piracy that’s got them in bother. Like fake designer goods, this sort of thing does fund organised crime.
I can see both sides here.
They're not dodgy streams though, we can all find those on the internet, but at the risk of stuff ending up on your kit, that can do harm. You pay a relatively small fee (compared to what sky/bt want) for not having that risk.Who the fuck is paying money for dodgy streams? There’s loads of them for free.
Absolutely.Corporate justice over people justice as usual.
In the eyes of the law they are and have been found guilty. Maybe a bit naive here but I'd prefer our underfunded police forces to put murderers, rapists, and nonces behind bars than protect an already corporate rich organisation.
Well yeah, it's 'profiteering' that's the issue. Still a bollocks sentence when you see some of the sentences for violent offences and people who are actually dangerous to the general public. If someone has been illegally profiteering, fine them enough to take everything they've ever owned.I think it’s the profiteering rather than the piracy that’s got them in bother. Like fake designer goods, this sort of thing does fund organised crime.
I can see both sides here.
Then give them 11 years for that.They also found kiddie porn on one of their computers. Lovely guys eh.
Well yeah, it's 'profiteering' that's the issue. Still a bollocks sentence when you see some of the sentences for violent offences and people who are actually dangerous to the general public. If someone has been illegally profiteering, fine them enough to take everything they've ever owned.
Then give them 11 years for that.
I guess, but if organized crime gangs are going to do something, I'd rather it was ripping off a few games of football and selling a few dodgy Chanel copies than selling drugs or trafficking people.I’d they’re part of an organised crime gang then I’m fine with the book being thrown at them. Which given the numbers involved seems likely.
I guess, but if organized crime gangs are going to do something, I'd rather it was ripping off a few games of football and selling a few dodgy Chanel copies than selling drugs or trafficking people.
So you're saying that sentences for crimes like forging a handbag or selling illegal Sky boxes are artificially increased because they are assumed to be linked to more serious crimes that for some reason can't be tried on their own merit?Well yeah but it’s not that simple is it. Like with fake handbags it’s not all isolated, these things fund other more serious crimes and 7 million quid seems like a pretty serious operation to me. Not jus two students doing it for beer money and to help out some footy fans is it.
So you're saying that sentences for crimes like forging a handbag or selling illegal Sky boxes are artificially increased because they are assumed to be linked to more serious crimes that for some reason can't be tried on their own merit?
Not sure about illegal streaming, but when it comes to fake goods there is no assumption, it’s well known it’s linked to all sorts of trafficking of drugs, people, arms.as well as child labour. Most of which goes unpunished. So when you buy your fakes, be aware of what you may be supporting.So you're saying that sentences for crimes like forging a handbag or selling illegal Sky boxes are artificially increased because they are assumed to be linked to more serious crimes that for some reason can't be tried on their own merit?
I know you’re joking mate, but just to say that game is free on bt sport YouTube channel I think.Could they not have hung on until after the Champions League final
It was a private prosecution undertaken by Trading Standards officers paid for by the Premier League. It had nothing to do with the copsCorporate justice over people justice as usual.
In the eyes of the law they are and have been found guilty. Maybe a bit naive here but I'd prefer our underfunded police forces to put murderers, rapists, and nonces behind bars than protect an already corporate rich organisation.