SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
The unfortunate thing is that none of the media are interested in accuracy whether financial or otherwise.
As you say click bait rather than a need for correct info.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
As you say click bait rather than a need for correct info.
Making Macini payments for his Al Jazira work seem like a bargain " Previous reports suggested Al-Hilal would pay Messi £369m-per-year, but if the latest reports are correct, they have upped their offer."Lionel Messi entourage ‘accepts’ eye-watering Saudi offer
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,944
The unfortunate thing is that none of the media are interested in accuracy whether financial or otherwise.
As you say click bait rather than a need for correct info.
I think with Panja and the NYT it is all rather more insidious than just clickbait .....
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Apologies if there are other issues which I am sure you can tell us about?I think with Panja and the NYT it is all rather more insidious than just clickbait .....
Real corruption would be if they find us guilty just in order to prove that a regulator is not needed. A genuine danger.The case by uefa and pl is corruption in action. However, as far as the cartel are concerned, corruption is ok as long as it benefits them, and them only.
G
G
ganganvince
Guest
If it isn't thrown out early regulator will be well I'm place by then.Real corruption would be if they find us guilty just in order to prove that a regulator is not needed. A genuine danger.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!These charges were announced 4 months ago, The Premier League doesn’t have confidence to enforce its own rule book so is appointing a judiciary panel to see the evidence and reach a verdict. They’ve sat on this so called evidence for over 3 years whilst City have won 3 premier league trophies in that time.
They can’t investigate and are not confident in reaching a verdict themselves in a timely manner. So they have to get someone else in to do it, are they not too confident of the case they have?
The recent news that City have pushed back on the charges and that it will take 2 to 4 years shows what a farce this all is. This doesn’t make the Premier League fit for purpose as a sporting body. If the time scales do go out to 4 years, the club and the Premier League will be arguing over accounts and incidents that will be nearly 20 years old. It’s not a witch hunt and we are all paranoid aren’t we?
SatOnTheWall
Well-Known Member
He’s a rag shithouse?Apologies if there are other issues which I am sure you can tell us about?
How anyone from Manchester can countenance working for that shitty-arsed fucking paper - after they wantonly and for their own financial gain revealed the details of the Manchester arena bombing when specifically asked not to by every relevant authority - is way beyond me. This panja individual clearly has no moral compass at all. Maybe he was involved, the disgusting fucking twat.
SatOnTheWall
Well-Known Member
Swales?I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
Frank Sinatra didn’t have us in any form to compete, City were a money pit at the time which John Wardle had to bail him out of. Why would the premier league be interested in anything like that?
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Exactly. Which kind of backs up the point that this is a witch hunt, pure and simple!Frank Sinatra didn’t have us in any form to compete, City were a money pit at the time which John Wardle had to bail him out of. Why would the premier league be interested in anything like that?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,944
Apologies if there are other issues which I am sure you can tell us about?
Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
I thought there was some reference to Panja specifically as one of the recipients of leaked information from UEFA on our defense of the original charges against us. Which then led to our "non-co-operation" with the enquiry and subsequent fine.
Dinas
Well-Known Member
Ironically, these are very serious issues which is just what any governing body should be interested in. Instead they look for historical infringements in our accounts which is not tackling the real problem - we all know that. An independent regulatory body is appealing - but what's to say these devious 'history' (we do it the right way) clubs will not 'capture' the regulator and still be the real force behind the scenes. It happens in many industries which are regulated like water for instance. If, as we think, these charges are empty of any substance and simply designed to protect the cartel - I really hope this message will be delivered to the industry and the fans - but cynically I suspect it will somehow be kept under wraps. It's shameful that they have deliberately besmirched our name and tried to undermine our achievements and also that so many resources, on all sides, have been devoted to such a hideous strategy. Those resources could have been put to much more effective use.Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
We weren't destroying the cartel thenI'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Thanks mate, sorry but didn't know the link you describe.Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
however I'm sure there are many reasons for the media to interpret the news the way they want rather than have old fashioned editorials that originally reflected political allegeance.
Who would have thpught it, cut out news and present your interpretation of it as the news with bias or even lies.
1. Not qualified for Euro comps then, so UEFA uninterested, even had they launched ffp earlier.I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
2. Prem league had few, if any, financial regs then.
Parry was a go to contact of Panja when he was the NW Football correspondent of MEN(?)Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
Wasn't he known as Gills bum boy?Parry was a go to contact of Panja when he was the NW Football correspondent of MEN(?)