Don't think the rags transfer dealings is a good reference point on whats good business. They usually value their unwanted players way too high, meaning nobody buys them, leading to them having a massive squad with overpaid and unhappy players they "can't" get rid off. In fact, we should be doing the exact opposite of what they are doing in almost all regards.if utd are valuing lego head at 40m then 30m is laughable
Are we going for the net spend trophy again?
The quad.Are we going for the net spend trophy again?
if utd are valuing lego head at 40m then 30m is laughable
I genuniely cannot understand how mount is valued at 60mDon't think anybody should be taking too much notice of what the rags value anything at.
Mount is their new saviour at £60 million with nobody else bidding .....
This is surely BS? €30m? They are having a laugh.
Source isn’t all that, but if you look at the squad they already have Tchoameni, Camavinga, Bellingham, Valverde, Modric, Kroos and Ceballos (and Guler) for 3 spots, and they want to sign Mbappe. Makes sense to sell one of them to make some money. I’d take either of the two. Tchouameni would be more similar to Rice if we’re looking for a slightly more defensive minded player. Valverde obviously more attacking, but can play RW too which is a big plus if either Bernardo or Mahrez goesId take either or both tbh.
I remember sam lee saying city were genuinely interested in tchoumeni in the year he moved but just too much money in the end as it was the same summer as grealish and potentially kane I believeSource isn’t all that, but if you look at the squad they already have Tchoameni, Camavinga, Bellingham, Valverde, Modric, Kroos and Ceballos (and Guler) for 3 spots, and they want to sign Mbappe. Makes sense to sell one of them to make some money. I’d take either of the two. Tchouameni would be more similar to Rice if we’re looking for a slightly more defensive minded player. Valverde obviously more attacking, but can play RW too which is a big plus if either Bernardo or Mahrez goes
I'd be throwing Laporte, Cancelo and cash at the to get either. Valverde is an obvious fit, Tchouameni could be moulded into anything under pep.Source isn’t all that, but if you look at the squad they already have Tchoameni, Camavinga, Bellingham, Valverde, Modric, Kroos and Ceballos (and Guler) for 3 spots, and they want to sign Mbappe. Makes sense to sell one of them to make some money. I’d take either of the two. Tchouameni would be more similar to Rice if we’re looking for a slightly more defensive minded player. Valverde obviously more attacking, but can play RW too which is a big plus if either Bernardo or Mahrez goes
That fee Is a result of the Sulk Tax, moody Park Bench Lip equals low ball price to attract any suiters willing to take a chance on a disgruntled player.Spanish international - peak years - multiple trophy success (when played), Yrs learning under Pep in an elite side. Seems cheap.
I'd be throwing Laporte, Cancelo and cash at the to get either. Valverde is an obvious fit, Tchouameni could be moulded into anything under pep.
Did I read somewhere a couple of weeks ago, that Real had accepted an £80 mullion bid from the scousers, or did I dream It.Valverde would be perfect for us!