Onholiday(somemightsay)
Well-Known Member
Have you been living under a rock.......... ;-)What does GPC mean?
Have you been living under a rock.......... ;-)What does GPC mean?
Whatever it might be, it’s definitely more than 10!I’m not sure a number exists on how many times better businessmen they are mate.
Raggle rock!Have you been living under a rock.......... ;-)
Had that been written by Winter, Delainey or any of the numerous City haters, I'd be fuming but Samuel is different. He's always come across as fair-minded when it comes to City
Exactly this. It’s like all the balanced and considered stuff he’s written counts for nought in some quarters.Had that been written by Winter, Delainey or any of the numerous City haters, I'd be fuming but Samuel is different. He's always come across as fair-minded when it comes to City
I think he's taken a permanent holiday by the looks.Intrigued to know what the original post was..........
Gibraltar..Have you been living under a rock.......... ;-)
Yes maybe he would, but was the whiskey nosed twat blind to all of Giggs's "indiscretions" ?No idea but I'm not saying Ferguson would have got rid of Greenwood because he's a champion against domestic abuse.
It's been clear since the story first broke that Greenwood was finished. Ferguson would have made it look like utd had taken the moral high ground.
Cheers mate.Andy Woodward make a comment on the James English podcast saying there’s still cover ups going on at the Rags, no more details.
He also said Giggs was involved in degrading pranks with the youth team boys, again it will come out 1 day.
Probably notYes maybe he would, but was the whiskey nosed twat blind to all of Giggs's "indiscretions" ?
I’m prepared to wager he wouldn’t!
I think Ferguson’s nose for these things was generally sound. He got rid of Whiteside, McGrath, Ince and Beckham at (there or thereabouts) their peak (and was criticised for so doing at each respective time) because he felt (correctly) that they were bad for the wider atmosphere in the dressing room, and/or were a distraction from (and for) the rest of the squad. I’m pretty sure he would have recognised this in Greenwood. Whatever he was, he was a streetwise survivor and that instinct would have given him the good sense to get rid well before this pitiful testing of the waters by the club.
As you say, it was clear to anyone applying common sense to the evidence that was in the public domain that this case was distinguished from others involving allegations of sexual offences against footballers, and the way united have acted in relation to this is all in keeping with the amateurish way the club is run under the Glazers, who are grossly incompetent in a way that sometimes defies belief. It’s actually not impossible for me to conceive that they are deliberately sabotaging the club, such is their catalogue of, and talent for, failure.
The lack of criticism that club gets in the media for things City would be publicly flogged for (FFP ‘minor’ breaches’ being the apotheosis) is an absolute fucking disgrace.
In fact, ironically enough, given the turn of debate in this thread, relative to their success and the application of their considerable resources to try and achieve it, the way the club is reported in the press today is far more egregious and tendentious than when Ferguson was at the helm.
They are a basket case of an organisation who are afforded a level of respect in the media that is wholly unwarranted.
Fucking clown car cunts.
We’ll never know of course but it would be interesting to know how Greenwood would’ve developed under Ferguson. From what we hear about his management ‘style’ he’d have known exactly what Greenwood was up to and where he was up to it. Maybe recent managers did and chose not to get involved but I’d hazard a guess Ferguson would’ve bounced him very quickly if he thought he couldn’t get through to him.
WOW! 3,628,800 times better ;)Whatever it might be, it’s definitely more than 10!
Interesting read. Anyone with half a brain knows that the public are being manipulated, you get to know what they want you to know.