Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
BringBackSwales said:
Simon Bajkowski isn’t a Blue is he? In his match ratings he said of Gomez “he didn’t do much in a match that was already won”, fucking hell that assist for Erling wasn’t too shabby?
Click to expand...
He’d only received the ball about three times before that and each time he kept possession. Not many players would have gone for the dribble right at the end of a game when you’re 4-1 up. Happy for him.
 
Might as well show Celtic winning it in 1967 but then again they don’t play in red
 
Lets be a bit honest. The goal should not have stand. Period.
But the scoreline 1-1 at halftime the game was far from over. No way it was a turning point. Half-time was when the players had to listen to Pep on the speakers.

The dodgy decisions that went United’s way actually proved match deciders.

Bu hey, everyone can now say there’s no agenda. We too get decisions our way.
 
eversince 76 said:
Lets be a bit honest. The goal should not have stand. Period.
But the scoreline 1-1 at halftime the game was far from over. No way it was a turning point. Half-time was when the players had to listen to Pep on the speakers.

The dodgy decisions that went United’s way actually proved match deciders.

Bu hey, everyone can now say there’s no agenda. We too get decisions our way.
Click to expand...

Correct! How many times we have gone at half-time level 1 down even 2 down and come back to win!? Fulham manager was going on like if that goal wasn't given they wouldn't of got something!! Utter bulshit evidenced shows they wouldn't off!
 
waspish said:
Correct! How many times we have gone at half-time level 1 down even 2 down and come back to win!? Fulham manager was going on like if that goal wasn't given they wouldn't of got something!! Utter bulshit evidenced shows they wouldn't off!
Click to expand...
As o said yesterday they could have come out fired up, angered by the percieved injustice of it, but they went to pieces, last week they had a man sent off and went and got an equaliser at arsenal and that was within ten mins, here they had a whole half to do it, yes it was a dodgy decision but to suggest it was a turning point in the game is complete crap
 
jimharri said:
If a Forest fan reads that, you're dead!


They hate being called "Notts" Forest. They see that as County's name.
Click to expand...
Probably because it is! (As you no doubt know)
Forest's official name is Nottingham Forest (not Forrest) Football Club.
County are Notts County Football Club, and have the distinction of being the world's oldest professional football club.
Sorry to tell you, rags and dippers, but they have more 'istree than the pair of you!
 
crazyg said:
Probably because it is! (As you no doubt know)
Forest's official name is Nottingham Forest (not Forrest) Football Club.
County are Notts County Football Club, and have the distinction of being the world's oldest professional football club.
Sorry to tell you, rags and dippers, but they have more 'istree than the pair of you!
Click to expand...
I'm not as thick as I look, you know? Which is probably as well.
 
jimmygrimblesboots said:
The media concentrating on VAR instead of our imperious start to the season , shock/horror VAR do not disallow a goal and in other news Haaland gets his 7th City hat trick.
The Rags have enjoyed several dodgy decisions already this season and virtually f*ck all is mentioned , we will never get 100% perfect refereeing decisions, it just isnt humanly possible , next week Fulham could get a dodgy goal but you can guarantee it will not overshadow everything else in the football match.
Anything that deflects from our brilliant football team and the media will take that route , they are in denial we have the best team ever to grace the Premier league but are shit scared of stating the facts because their core customer base would disappear overnight
Click to expand...
Dippers galore piling in on the injustice that will rob them of another rightful title win.
The number of them claiming its obvious City have bought var is side splittingly funny, but depressing at the same time that some actually believe it's true. I expect the gluepots on rawk should have some interesting and totally unbiased comments to add to the debate regarding the offside decision.
 
Rochdale Blue said:
Dippers galore piling in on the injustice that will rob them of another rightful title win.
The number of them claiming its obvious City have bought var is side splittingly funny, but depressing at the same time that some actually believe it's true. I expect the gluepots on rawk should have some interesting and totally unbiased comments to add to the debate regarding the offside decision.
Click to expand...
the fact that they werent down to 9 men lst week is down to dodgy refereeing, the penalty they got and didnt get given against them against bournemouth are quickly forgotten in their faux and ridiculous outrage isnt it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top