Royal Family abusing their power

lloydie said:
Not this ****, £45m pay rise...
www.express.co.uk

King Charles criticised for 'working less than seven weeks' in a year

Anti-monarchy group Republic have heavily criticised the number of engagements he has carried out in the past 12 months - despite the monarch being well over the UK's retirement age.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
Click to expand...
What’s wrong with the “If your work/life balance was skewed so heavily on the work side, you wouldn’t have time to criticise the royal family” argument?
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
Dirty shower of thieving inbreds.
Good for nothings, not only getting paid for sitting on their arses doing nothing, but then reselling the same story of their bad behaviour and inaction over and over In documentaries about their inaction.
Repeat after repeat after repeats, never off our screens……..

Oh. Scratch that, sorry…….
Thought you said The Royle Family.
Click to expand...
A-fucking-men.

Vive la republique
 
lloydie said:
Not this ****, £45m pay rise...
www.express.co.uk

King Charles criticised for 'working less than seven weeks' in a year

Anti-monarchy group Republic have heavily criticised the number of engagements he has carried out in the past 12 months - despite the monarch being well over the UK's retirement age.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
Click to expand...
The ‘analysis’ put out by Republic is pretty desperate stuff, and just shows how desperate they are in fact. Nobody cares what they think.

You also have to laugh at people from Republic for having the temerity to criticise anybody for how they use their time, let alone the King. These of course are the people who hang around churches and town halls all day, just so that they can sing their silly little song when the King goes about his day, to the bemusement and indeed annoyance of the vast, vast majority of people there. Or like the other day when they bought tickets to go in Buckingham Palace so that they could get a photograph taken with their daft jumpers on.

And then they’ve got the neck on them to criticise what the King does, when anyone and everyone who has ever worked with him says that he works like a Trojan. Pathetic.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
What’s wrong with the “If your work/life balance was skewed so heavily on the work side, you wouldn’t have time to criticise the royal family” argument?
Click to expand...
Good point, I would do well to listen to some of the servile, lickspittle, flagshaggers on here, though how they find time to post amidst their work hard/get rich grind is beyond me.
 
Brewster's millions said:
The ‘analysis’ put out by Republic is pretty desperate stuff, and just shows how desperate they are in fact. Nobody cares what they think.

You also have to laugh at people from Republic for having the temerity to criticise anybody for how they use their time, let alone the King. These of course are the people who hang around churches and town halls all day, just so that they can sing their silly little song when the King goes about his day, to the bemusement and indeed annoyance of the vast, vast majority of people there. Or like the other day when they bought tickets to go in Buckingham Palace so that they could get a photograph taken with their daft jumpers on.

And then they’ve got the neck on them to criticise what the King does, when anyone and everyone who has ever worked with him says that he works like a Trojan. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

Could you define 'work' here.
 
aguero93:20 said:
Nah, that was the Greeks. The Trojans were the ones drinking on the job and fooling around with other men's wives.
Click to expand...
Was Camilla another man’s woman when Chas was married to Di?
Not that it matters to me, I’m working on a plan for your 50/50 option still.
I’ve checked Ancestry.com and I think I can rule out the hereditary channel. So I’ll have to go with option 1.
 
mackenzie said:
I think it's good that they wear something more than once. Or even a few times. I think the Queen did it too. Nothing wrong in it at all. Should be something to aspire too, away from the throwaway society we seem to have
Click to expand...

agreed - it was more of a piss take about the Mails Royal Correspondent thinking that was news - I mean it could also be asked why hasn't she grown in 12 months. Its just all cap doffing stupidity - they never ask it about jeans or sportswear - maybe they can't identify what they wear and when unless its glaringly obvious - maybe the cap peak obscures their view
 
Kirkstall Blue said:
I’m sure they do try to interfere with the running of parliament Charles has been known to write letters to parliament giving his views. I can’t fault him over Cornwall as I don’t approve of all the council tenants having the right to buy their homes.
Now there are no decent houses left for people to rent we as a country paid rates and taxes so they could be built we own them as a collective same with everything else that’s been sold off I wish they would interfere more.
Click to expand...
This is what I wrote last September thought I’d repeat the same thing I’m in favour of a monarch but not the bow and genuflect type that we have now but slimmed down and get rid of parliament in favour of an Northern England government where we pay taxes, so they can sort out the problems of the North
 
Kirkstall Blue said:
This is what I wrote last September thought I’d repeat the same thing I’m in favour of a monarch but not the bow and genuflect type that we have now but slimmed down and get rid of parliament in favour of an Northern England government where we pay taxes, so they can sort out the problems of the North
Click to expand...
I'm also in favour of a slimmed down monarchy. I think the King is too. Not surprised with that brother he has. Plus a few of the others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top