dublinblue12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 4,120
Both sides are cunts just feel sorry for the innocent people on both sides who inevitably end up being the victims
Arafat signing Israel’s deal would have signed his death warrant (That the IDF sorted anyway).Gaza would have really flourished if only they had good leaders.
I recall before the first intifada, there was no wall between Israel and Gaza. People traveled freely to work in Israel and returned home to their families living in Gaza.
All that changed when Arafat rejected the two-state peace proposal in 2000 and launched the intifada. Gaza has been going downhill ever since.
Sad.
I wasn’t suggesting it was charitable, merely measured.The reason Israel’s response may appear muted to some posters might be because they were caught so unaware by the terrorists. Not just the attacks on the rave and villages but also by the tank busting kit Hams had access to. Piling straight into Gaza without a thorough and up to date assessment of the terrorists” capability could have proven a graveyard for many more Israeli soldiers, especially given the layout of Gaza.
It’s far safer for Israeli forces to be bombing Gaza from the skies until the Israeli army are ready to invade Gaza and they have a robust intelligence assessment of what awaits them. It’s not a charitable decision.
I only was going off a news report that I posted but there’s no guarantee that was accurate.Actualy Im looking that up now and it seems they have had talks and were going to but as you said Isreal have stoped it
When did I say Israel had to provide the food and water.
It was reported that Israel was bombing people trying to leave Gaza, I think to Egypt. Hopefully this wasn’t true but it will contribute to a humanitarian catastrophe if that’s happening. I thought Netanyahu had told Gazans to leave.
I've read a few sources seems legit I always cross referenceI only was going off a news report that I posted but there’s no guarantee that was accurate.
A strong defence often requires a targeted offence. I make no excuses for Israel’s determined self-defence.Oh, please. The IDF have been targeting civilian sites for decades and have never given a shit about those casualties because they faced zero repercussions.
And, no, this isn't a defence of anything Hamas has done but it is disingenuous to act like Israel have at any point been legitimately considerate of the lives of Palestinian citizens.
Egypt have recently agreed to supply aid but refuse to take refugeesAny refugees that leave are blocked from a right to return too.
I am an admirer of the ruthless efficiency of the IDF (over many years). It’s the political leadership that I dislike and how people on both sides are brought up to despise each other.I wasn’t suggesting it was charitable, merely measured.
As you said, they can bomb from the air with relative impunity, yet even then it had been highly targeted, as opposed to a “shock and awe” statement.
Hamas don't do elections.When were the last elections?
I saw the footage. It looked like they were targeting the tunnels.When did I say Israel had to provide the food and water.
It was reported that Israel was bombing people trying to leave Gaza, I think to Egypt. Hopefully this wasn’t true but it will contribute to a humanitarian catastrophe if that’s happening. I thought Netanyahu had told Gazans to leave.
Speaking of strawmen…!Solution is to not cut off food, water and aid to civilians as per the Geneva Convention with it being a war crime.
Build as many strawmen as you want, I’m not dignifying such idiocy with a rebuttal, suffice to say I’ve forgotten more about WW2 than you’ll ever know.
Sadly, that's not Israel's problem.It could stop blockading them by sea in that case.
Gaza doesn't have its own drinkable water reservoirs or desalination plant.
Egypt have recently agreed to supply aid but refuse to take refugees
I'm sure if Hammas handed the hostages and themselves over, aid would be allowed in straight away and moreSadly, that's not Israel's problem.
Hamas is the elected government of Gaza.
It is their responsibility to provide these amenities that you mentioned.
Hamas don't do elections.
They butchered the Fatah members living in Gaza immediately they came to power and the rest is now history.
Agreed on both counts.I am an admirer of the ruthless efficiency of the IDF (over many years). It’s the political leadership that I dislike and how peephole on both sides are brought up to despise each other.
The intelligence failings came as a big shock and Israel can’t rely on their contacts in Gaza atm. That’s why I think Israel continues to strike Hamas to deplete (as much as they can from the air) opposition forces / terrorists before the inevitable invasion.
That deal provided for a two-state solution. The whole of Gaza was ceded to Arafat and 94% of the West Bank plus East Jerusalem as capital. This was the deal rejected by Arafat in 2000. A quick google search would confirm this.Arafat signing Israel’s deal would have signed his death warrant (That the IDF sorted anyway).
Why did Israel not concede the 2% of traditionally Palestinian land that scuppered the deal.
I think it was down to religious sites IIRC that were important to Israelites and Palestinians: Neither party gave up on their red lines so why highlight Arafat?