bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,548
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,161
Had to get Pep to tell him thoughFirst time I’ve actually seen someone in such a position refer to what the charges are about.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,161
Probably because Pep makes Stone look stupid every weekExactly. He just wanted to get Pep to bite. Should have been told to fuck off.
Why does that guy sit next to Pep and do sweet fuck all?
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Just about his most accurate article ever. Not that it tells us anything we don’t know but it’s straight to the point and cuts through all the bullshit we’ve been subjected to.
Zabbasbeard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 3,918
- Team supported
- Manchester City
"Analysis by Simon Stone" - as if that
",Analysis" by Simon Stone. As if it has any worth. Does he know what the word means.
The trouble is that if we go down and lose our sponsorships, the haters will be proved right: Pep just could not do it in a lower league with a small budget. I am assuming the PL will ban him from using his coaching abilities.Pep’s just said in his presser there’s more of a chance of him staying at the club if we were to get relegated to league one than there would’ve been after winning the champions league.
he just gets it - what a bloke
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
He doesn’t need Pep or anyone else to make himself look stupidProbably because Pep makes Stone look stupid every week
Zabbasbeard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 3,918
- Team supported
- Manchester City
"Analysis by Simon Stone" - as if that
Correct on the 2nd question.Did Pep say he would leave if we were found guilty?
I thought he said he would leave if our people had lied to him?
super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 53,659
Makes me laugh mate. The more they poke the bear the more he throws it back in their face. I love a bit of Pep baiting, fires him right up. I predict another run about to start.Pep is God.
Simon Jordan = stooge. He's saying what his producer wants him to say.According to Simon Jordan it is City that should be proving their innocence. I thought that the burden of proof lay with the Premier League because of the severity of the accusations. He wants us to own up to everything even if we haven't done anything wrong He is an idiot, look at poor Everton, owned up and were docked ten points. That went well for them.
City have not been charged with hiding sponsorship deals but rather with hiding owner funding disguised as sponsorship.Just about his most accurate article ever. Not that it tells us anything we don’t know but it’s straight to the point and cuts through all the bullshit we’ve been subjected to.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
embargoed bit should be good later if past ones are to go by
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,161
Yes, but we wouldn't want to stand in his way eitherHe doesn’t need Pep or anyone else to make himself look stupid
This is the latest pile on by several commentators and isAccording to Simon Jordan it is City that should be proving their innocence. I thought that the burden of proof lay with the Premier League because of the severity of the accusations. He wants us to own up to everything even if we haven't done anything wrong He is an idiot, look at poor Everton, owned up and were docked ten points. That went well for them.
nonsense; the hearing goes: Accusation~~~>Evidence of wrongdoing~~~>Rebuttal by defence evidence.
Besides City are bound by confidentiality rules.
Ballosteve
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 717
NpI have just put a scouse ex rag straight this morning about the attack on certain clubs citing Newcastle and the loan vote as an example, the silly **** used the "Well they all sign up for it excuse" a moron of the
No he says what his mate Daniel levy wants him to say.Simon Jordan = stooge. He's saying what his producer wants him to say.
Sleeping_Easy
Well-Known Member
Oh go on then I'll watch this one again
blue for life
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 2,813
Can you imagine we win the UCL the next two seasons whilst at the same time playing in League One?
If we went down it would have to be one of the most memorable seasons in our history, and there's a few contenders for that. Imagine the atmospheres. Imagine twatting everybody in the Championship and then coming back and winning the PL. I can see us doing that if we had to. Only a mass exodus could scupper that and we're in a very different position to where we were in the good/bad old days of the 90s because of the infrastructure behind the scenes. Every cloud!The trouble is that if we go down and lose our sponsorships, the haters will be proved right: Pep just could not do it in a lower league with a small budget. I am assuming the PL will ban him from using his coaching abilities.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
For all the terrible things going on over here in Yankee Land, the quality of our sports journalism cannot possibly ever sink to the level of the flabbergasting pile of giraffe shit you all have to wade through daily.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Yes, true. I’m guessing that’s what Stone meant after being educated by PepCity have not been charged with hiding sponsorship deals but rather with hiding owner funding disguised as sponsorship.