Joey Barton

Hmmm, so everything can be adjusted according to where your views lie. Lineker didn’t mean what he said, but Barton did - how convenient. Thanks for clearing it up.
The confusing beauty of linguistic semantics I suppose.
I bet you can’t even quote what Lineker said.
Said, mind, not what you thought he said.
 
Linekers views aren't skewed he's a ****.

Bartons views aren't skewed he's a ****.

How has society got to such a point where people are desperately getting their opinions from cunts and posting them almost as facts?

In the case where the right-wing echo chamber said Linekar was comparing the Conservatives to Nazi's when he said no such thing, I think his views were skewed in that case.

I don't agree with everything he writes and I hear he likes his escorts (allegedly) but there doesn't seem an intended malice behind Linekars views.

Barton on the other hand...

We'll probably disagree though and that's cool.

As for your last point, where to start? The breakdown in trust with traditional media, the rise in grifters, the rise in conspiracy theories, people living in echo chambers...
 
In the case where the right-wing echo chamber said Linekar was comparing the Conservatives to Nazi's when he said no such thing, I think his views were skewed in that case.

I don't agree with everything he writes and I hear he likes his escorts (allegedly) but there doesn't seem an intended malice behind Linekars views.

Barton on the other hand...

We'll probably disagree though and that's cool.

As for your last point, where to start? The breakdown in trust with traditional media, the rise in grifters, the rise in conspiracy theories, people living in echo chambers...

Disagreeing with me is perfectly fine mate, as long as you don't try to prove your point by posting a twitter (X) of someone "influential" proving your point just because they are famous.
 
Disagreeing with me is perfectly fine mate, as long as you don't try to prove your point by posting a twitter (X) of someone "influential" proving your point just because they are famous.
Would Lineker’s actual tweet suffice even though he posted it on X/Twitter?
 
Jeremy Vine is suing Joeseph. He’s posted the papers he’s been served with and forgot to hide his address on it. Barton will be getting the Adam Tease treatment X100 over the next few days!
 
Check on twitter (X) for me and let me know, I am not basing my opinion on the **** on one tweet though.
Just had a look at the reports in the Mail and other right wing media websites from that time and none of them actually show the tweet. They just misreport its contents to get people frothing. Anyway here it is.



If you think that’s comparable to Barton’s obnoxious misogyny please explain how.
 
Just had a look at the reports in the Mail and other right wing media websites from that time and none of them actually show the tweet. They just misreport its contents to get people frothing. Anyway here it is.



If you think that’s comparable to Barton’s obnoxious misogyny please explain how.


I never said it was comparable, twitter (X) is addling your brain. You are actually just proving my point. If you don't like what people tweet then stop going on twitter and for gods sake stop posting the shit here.

I believe Lineker and Barton to be cunts, post another tweet to prove yourself right.
 
I never said it was comparable, twitter (X) is addling your brain. You are actually just proving my point. If you don't like what people tweet then stop going on twitter and for gods sake stop posting the shit here.

I believe Lineker and Barton to be cunts, post another tweet to prove yourself right.
I think you’ve lost it mate. In your last post you actually asked me to check on Twitter and let you know!
Anyway I’ll leave it there as neither of us seem to understand the other’s point and it’s not worth the effort.
 
Jeremy Vine is suing Joeseph. He’s posted the papers he’s been served with and forgot to hide his address on it. Barton will be getting the Adam Tease treatment X100 over the next few days!

Brought it on himself for no reason.
 
Why’s Lineker a **** ?
Because he has decent morals and is a multi-millionaire, loves football, has some great mates, has a great job. All these things are destined to make others jealous and therefore the easy cop-out is to label him a ****. That’s all I can think of.
 
Because he has decent morals and is a multi-millionaire, loves football, has some great mates, has a great job. All these things are destined to make others jealous and therefore the easy cop-out is to label him a ****. That’s all I can think of.
Ah jealousy.
Decent morals, great mates? Those reasons for envy? A number of his partners may question the former.
Is mult millionaire still something to be jealous of? He may not be a" ****" but come on, do better than that. You come over as envious if you cite such things. Clearly they cross your mind as factors.
 
I never said it was comparable, twitter (X) is addling your brain. You are actually just proving my point. If you don't like what people tweet then stop going on twitter and for gods sake stop posting the shit here.

I believe Lineker and Barton to be cunts, post another tweet to prove yourself right.
Why is lineker a ****? Seems to have decent morals and calls out far right idiots, he'll do for me.
 
Check on twitter (X) for me and let me know, I am not basing my opinion on the **** on one tweet though.
With all due respect, I've read numerous comments by you on this thread expressing your obvious hatred for Gary Lineker. Strangely though, I've yet to see one that makes clear why you feel he deserves to be repeatedly labelled a '****'. That is, unless you believe that such insults are justified for those in the public eye who express their views on social media platforms and, worse, where those views happen to differ from yours. I'm genuinely interested to know.
 
With all due respect, I've read numerous comments by you on this thread expressing your obvious hatred for Gary Lineker. Strangely though, I've yet to see one that makes clear why you feel he deserves to be repeatedly labelled a '****'. That is, unless you believe that such insults are justified for those in the public eye who express their views on social media platforms and, worse, where those views happen to differ from yours. I'm genuinely interested to know.


There is a thread on Lineker already, I get some people think he's marvellous I however do not. I said he was a **** I didn't say that I hated him.

He's a virtue signalling pompous arsehole , that should be enough shouldn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top