SamBlue
Well-Known Member
Don't like this at all, compounded by the fact it is assholes across the town.
plus he's bald :)So they’re hiring a ceo who’s been involved in fraud on a massive scale for over a decade?
I think it’s a £2m a year salary there without bonuses so probably more than doubling his money.Probably as simple as him getting a substantial payrise. I could care less, its not like they have nicked Haaland from us. I'm sure we will hire somebody equally competent to replace him.
We don't "need" anybody. Doesn't mean we clearly valued him very highly and will be a loss to us. More than that though, we wouldn't have employed him and promoted him numerous times and wouldn't have reportedly saw him as the natural in-house successor should any of his superiors leave their roles if he wasn't a very capable person. He's not going to allow united to continue to be the laughing stock they currently are. That's over when he takes charge.Well we don’t need him then do we
Am I missing something?Can we not get an edit on the title or something to stop the Twitter levels of idiocy about this potentially having something to do with the charges.its bad enough when thick as pig shit dippers and cockney rags start spouting it, I'd assume city fans were a bit more level headed and could see the very obvious flaws in those suggestions.
If we are found guilty of any of the actually genuinely serious charges, the entire upper management hierarchy are looking at very lengthy bans from football, If not permanent bans and prison sentences too. Leaving the club doesn't exclude you from that.
I don't believe this to be true at all, but, if there was any relevance to the charges in this move, I would say it would be a positive indication we won't see guilty verdicts rather than the opposite.
United aren't going to employ and hand over the reigns of the club to somebody that's got a heads up he's about to be doing time and coming out to a ban.
Quite true. Seems to have been an important part of the senior leadership team. If the organisation chart is correct is on the lower rungs of that team. Will be missed short term but should be relatively easy to replaceDon’t be daft, he’s played a huge part in getting the club to where it is. He’s earned the right to have a go at the top job elsewhere.
Obviously a bit of a blow to lose him, but not like it’s Pep or Txiki going. I’m sure he’ll be replaced by someone similarly competent and we’ll continue on an upward trajectory.
The Prince wants a Kingdom…it happens. CEO at United is a big step-up for him, although their ownership/operating model may be a big challenge. He will no doubt retain a lot of affection for City and happy memories but these people are not fans and he will be ambitious for a top (CEO) job, much higher profile than his current role. As Khaldoon said, our people being poached is a compliment. Does anyone know if we have an in-house successor ? Either way City will have detailed development and succession planning for all the top executive roles. I’m not worried in the slightest.
I guess working at united counts as "outside of football".So he is a CEO and will be doing thing outside of football?
Yes - he's gone to the ragsSo he is a CEO and will be doing thing outside of football?