That might be pointed at me. And I didnt know. Just didnt know. Which is why I asked. It was a simple thing but I dint know you had all those thoughts around it wow.It is given that nobody outside of the people who should know have access to the actual figures, so posting they must have failed is nonsensical. Everything after that just follows on from a (possibly) incorrect assumption.
On an aside and not pointed at you, why are people finding it difficult to distinguish between UEFA and PL charges plus failing FFP and being charged with deliberately misleading UEFA and the PL? I blame the modern disease of whataboutery. People seem to have stopped using their own brains and believe whatever some no-mark on Twitter tells them without just pausing a moment and thinking about the actual facts.
I complained to UEFA about the apparent abandonment of the enquiry into the leaks from the Investigatory chamber. No reply. Reminder sent. No reply.I still have not had a reply to my complaint. What a surprise?! If you don't hear from me again the UEFA police have probably paid me a visit. LOL. I have sent them a reminder...
If it was pointed at you bud (or anyone in particular) then I'd have happily told you or them so. Don't be so sensitive.That might be pointed at me. And I didnt know. Just didnt know. Which is why I asked. It was a simple thing but I dint know you had all those thoughts around it wow.
Sounds like your pal has just made it up so your last line doesn’t ring true.I've had some halfwit on Facebook, inform me that there is actually 293 charges .the rest will be delta with after the first batch. I've asked him to inform Lord pannick kc . And can he say what these other 178 charges are? European contingent is the reply ?? There are79 charges we will be unable to deny and WHEN we are found guilty the outcome will be bad , You couldn't make it up?
Not if it’s the donkey that getting it shoved up!It's arse, not ass, ;-)
He's certainly not my pal.Sounds like your pal has just made it up so your last line doesn’t ring true.
Apologies if i'm being dense but I didn't think we'd actually been charged with anything yet. I thought we were being investigated for alleged breaches and that on conclusion of those investigations we'd be charged. Or is that one and the same thing?We aren't charged with failing FFP but I'd guess that it's more to do with allegedly providing misleading accounts. Same for the PL's PSR.
At least they are consistent. The swines.I complained to UEFA about the apparent abandonment of the enquiry into the leaks from the Investigatory chamber. No reply. Reminder sent. No reply.
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum
Your first 6 words should be enough.I've had some halfwit on Facebook, inform me that there is actually 293 charges .the rest will be delta with after the first batch. I've asked him to inform Lord pannick kc . And can he say what these other 178 charges are? European contingent is the reply ?? There are79 charges we will be unable to deny and WHEN we are found guilty the outcome will be bad , You couldn't make it up?
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum
Suits us as well tbh but Newcastle and Villa won't like it. Any efforts to get their turnovers up are also being heavily scrutinised so on we merrily go with the mob hoping our 115 are upheld.
It's suckling the life out of the game.
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum
here we go again changing the rules to suit the scum
I'm not sure why this changes much for the PL clubs.
Now: the big clubs can spend more because they have higher income.
With this: the same applies.
There may be some minor effects at where the 35m/season loss crosses over with the %revenue spending, but it surely will please an owner who doesn't want to invest further.
The sixth words alone should suffice.Your first 6 words should be enough.