Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bloody hell Simeone sticking up for Pep and us

Diego Simeone "The world is so full of double standard. If Pep and Manchester city today signs Mbappe for €200 million you would read and hear negative narratives , but when it's our neighbors all is fine it's not oil or Arab money."

"I have to defend Pep who's scrutinized when he makes big money signings. When I look at his club I do not see a man who was bought over a €100 million. Halaand was less than that and obvious now He is above that. I think his philosophy of dominance have confused the world thinking he depends on spending. If He likes He can take a Manchester city academy players and still run away with the league. He has already done that at FC Barcelona with their academy."

"I can assure you it would be a bad day for of us in La Liga if we can wake up to the news of Pep return. "

Always liked the absolute ****.
 
Chris Eubank handing Jordan his arse, with considerable aplomb.
11.30 onwards.


Brilliant. Simon is a two faced bottom feeding journalist.

Eubank has said what we all know and think about this prick. He plays the game by winding up blues.
 
I wonder when it’s going to click with the gutter press, Sly Sports and TNT that City are the only team pulling for the PL as far as the European co-efficient is concerned. That 5th place is looking further and further away after the Tarquin’s performance…
 
I bet Mike Keegan couldn’t wait to write the article and to get it online. I’m surprised he didn’t refer to City as the Noisy Neighbours.

Not only can United not move on from the past, neither can their army of paid Shill Journalists.(Alex Ferguson’s Famous Battle Cry)

View attachment 107775
Our team talk for next week
 
You won't get the Coach Wreckers on social media highlighting what Klopp said once again about their poor support at Anfield.

View attachment 107849
Most of the moronic keyboard warriors who bang on about atmosphere have never set foot in the Victimdrome.
 
Last edited:
Can’t remember who came up with the game of reporting comments on BBC HYS but it’s great fun.

Reported a comment after the Brentford game that said “cheats always prosper”

Was rejected as it didn’t break house rules. Escalated it to ask who had been convicted of cheating?

The response
Well done, I think that might be the first documented successful appeal, they usually stonewall all the appeals.
 
Does make me wonder how Eubank can be so righteous when he killed someone and got away with a slap on the wrist.
Hard to say but he was fined £250 and 6 points, he wasn't speeding and said his car slid on grit on the road when he braked for a corner.

Awful for the dead man's family but sometimes things are just a genuine accident.

Though I think ot would torture me that I had killed a person for the rest of my life, my sister's boyfriend (at the time) killed a child who biked straight out of an unofficial cut from woodland next to a 40moh road and rode straight in front of his car, he cradled him as he died, he was never the same man after that tbh.
 
Does make me wonder how Eubank can be so righteous when he killed someone and got away with a slap on the wrist.
think your getting him mixed up with Prince Nas Hamed to be fair, they both boxed and jumped over the top ropes as an entrance but that’s where the similarities end
 
Hard to say but he was fined £250 and 6 points, he wasn't speeding and said his car slid on grit on the road when he braked for a corner.

Awful for the dead man's family but sometimes things are just a genuine accident.

Though I think ot would torture me that I had killed a person for the rest of my life, my sister's boyfriend (at the time) killed a child who biked straight out of an unofficial cut from woodland next to a 40moh road and rode straight in front of his car, he cradled him as he died, he was never the same man after that tbh.
Very true there are genuine accidents but to slide on grit to the extent you can kill someone then you aren’t driving according to the conditions

With regard to your sister’s boyfriend that is so tragic and respect to him for that. I can’t imagine what it was like. Thanks for sharing.
 
Can’t remember who came up with the game of reporting comments on BBC HYS but it’s great fun.

Reported a comment after the Brentford game that said “cheats always prosper”

Was rejected as it didn’t break house rules. Escalated it to ask who had been convicted of cheating?

The response
Nice one. Trust me it's a great game.
 
I remember Keegan doing a piece for MuEN before both legs of 2010 League Cup semi finals. It went into cocksucking excitement when he reported "there are 200 high risk yoonited fans near the Asda, opposite the Etihad." Then before the second leg at his beloved swamp, is where his pathetic LIVE article all went wrong. He is in with 800 high risk City fans approaching the theatre of wet dreams. He reports there are a few rags trying to goad the Blues. We are approaching the Matt Busby statue, then all of a sudden he types "City have broken the escort and are attacking people" or summat of that nature. The said LIVE report suddenly ends and no more was reported on it since. The tool obviously shit himself and wasn't getting the desired result for his stupid article. An absolute buffoon.
 
I agree it’s like he’s facing a parliamentary inquiry, there’s no need for it , it’s boring it’s repetitive. I think if both pep and us had our way we’d fuck it off completely, the club need to stop worrying about the image grow some town halls , they desperately need us more than we need them.
Could easily be sorted by a briefing to the media before these press conferences - Pep will only be answering football related questions about the game in question.
 
Can’t remember who came up with the game of reporting comments on BBC HYS but it’s great fun.

Reported a comment after the Brentford game that said “cheats always prosper”

Was rejected as it didn’t break house rules. Escalated it to ask who had been convicted of cheating?

The response

A little hint. When you ask for a post to be deleted, refer to the various investigations into the club (2014 settled without admitting guilt, 2019 cleared by CAS and 2023/4 merely allegations at this point) so the reference to the club cheating is, firstly, without evidence and possibly libellous, secondly, inflammatory, and, thirdly, off -topic. All of which, I suggest, breach the HYS terms.

That puts the fear of God into the moderators. :)

Also, give yourself a HYS name that suggests a legal background ;)
 
Can’t remember who came up with the game of reporting comments on BBC HYS but it’s great fun.

Reported a comment after the Brentford game that said “cheats always prosper”

Was rejected as it didn’t break house rules. Escalated it to ask who had been convicted of cheating?

The response
Horse and bolted comes to mind. No one will be going back to an archived page on City v Brentford so whether it stays or gets removed is pretty irrelevant.

It should have been deleted at the time without the delay caused by escalation.

And it should be City who are fucking hammering the BBC for this not fans.

It’s not difficult.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top