I’m dim & acute mate, so fuck knows ;)You have to be clever or obtuse to understand that,which bracket do you fit into?
I’m dim & acute mate, so fuck knows ;)You have to be clever or obtuse to understand that,which bracket do you fit into?
Exactly the point CAS made. The conspiracy required is just not credible.This is the argument i love having with our detractors, basically they are accusing us of dodgy dealing and off the record payments. They have been and continue to demand investigations to try and uncover the evidence but cant find any. And then we are expected to believe the very people who want us charged for dodgy accounting have been bought off with backhanders.
In reality if this was the case all it would take is for one person to come forward as a whistleblower and we would be bang to rights and tarnished forever.
Funny how nobody ever has done isnt it :)
I meant in terms of spending crazy amounts in order to dominate the league (or at least get into the CL).
See, you've made me go there now
![]()
Man City expulsion? FFP punishments ranked by how much it will impact Pep Guardiola's side
The pitch forks are out amid fresh 'expulsion' claims as we await the verdict on Manchester City's alleged 115 breaches of FFP. How will they feel about their potential sanctions?www.football365.com
![]()
Man City 'expulsion' is 'on the table' for 'the first time' as 52-page document is released amid 'farce' claims
Potential "expulsion" is now "on the table" for Man City "for the first time" if they are found guilty of their financial charges, Keith Wyness suggests.www.football365.com
![]()
Man City FFP 'expulsion' leads £78m star to Arsenal as Barcelona beat Real Madrid to midfielder
The FFP trial has finally begun and we've reassigned the Man City players on the assumption that they will be dumped from the Premier League.www.football365.com
just from 2 minutes looking
What is it you think you’ve found? No one has said F365 never cover the charges (that would be pretty weird), and reporting high profile comments from Liverpools mayor is not evidence of some anti-City editorial policy.
Come on, jeez.
I used to read it, but lately, most of the stories use the same clickbait Media watch calls out on other platforms. The 'expulsion' thing is a good example, where someone said that if the charges were proven it could result in expulsion from the PL, which I don't think would surprise anyone, including City fans, but they're now using it to give the impression that when the 'expulsion' happens, this player is moving to generate clicks from all concerned.Media literacy on here is awful. We frequently see people mistake a journalist reporting a quote as the journalist saying the quote, as well as blaming news outlets for the accuracy of their user comments FFS.
I read F365 most days because it’s a good aggregator. Sometimes they try a bit hard to be funny, but they’ve got nothing against the club unless your standard is that everyone less committed to City than Pete the badge is part of a campaign against the club.
Then again, there is literally not a single news outlet in the sport that hasn’t been deemed to be part of the rag dipper media conspiracy so I don’t know why I even bother pointing out when someone talks that bollocks for the 8,000th time.
That's because we've paid them offThis is the argument i love having with our detractors, basically they are accusing us of dodgy dealing and off the record payments. They have been and continue to demand investigations to try and uncover the evidence but cant find any. And then we are expected to believe the very people who want us charged for dodgy accounting have been bought off with backhanders.
In reality if this was the case all it would take is for one person to come forward as a whistleblower and we would be bang to rights and tarnished forever.
Funny how nobody ever has done isnt it :)
Media literacy on here is awful. We frequently see people mistake a journalist reporting a quote as the journalist saying the quote, as well as blaming news outlets for the accuracy of their user comments FFS.
I read F365 most days because it’s a good aggregator. Sometimes they try a bit hard to be funny, but they’ve got nothing against the club unless your standard is that everyone less committed to City than Pete the badge is part of a campaign against the club.
Then again, there is literally not a single news outlet in the sport that hasn’t been deemed to be part of the rag dipper media conspiracy so I don’t know why I even bother pointing out when someone talks that bollocks for the 8,000th time.
I used to read it, but lately, most of the stories use the same clickbait Media watch calls out on other platforms. The 'expulsion' thing is a good example, where someone said that if the charges were proven it could result in expulsion from the PL, which I don't think would surprise anyone, including City fans, but they're now using it to give the impression that when the 'expulsion' happens, this player is moving to generate clicks from all concerned.
It must work in terms of their overall advertising revenue, but I now avoid them, along with most of the papers, as the headline will have little in common with the actual words. Does result in an echo chamber of news about the charges, but I've given up trying to find proper journalism about them anywhere else.
That's because we've paid them off
There's an insanity that thinks we'd pay them off, but only after they've charged usThis is what always gets me, we’re apparently bribing the very people who came up with the charges and then bribing them even more to prolong the investigation.
In some weird case of corporate masochism.
Utter lunacy to think people like Nick Harris have anything against City isn’t it?
What does Nick Harris have to do with F365?
Interesting, if true.
Nothing. You brought up a wider media conspiracy which I can only think has been mentioned due to other journalists outside of F365.
Bollocks? F365 are so negative toward City it's not even worth discussing...Media literacy on here is awful. We frequently see people mistake a journalist reporting a quote as the journalist saying the quote, as well as blaming news outlets for the accuracy of their user comments FFS.
I read F365 most days because it’s a good aggregator. Sometimes they try a bit hard to be funny, but they’ve got nothing against the club unless your standard is that everyone less committed to City than Pete the badge is part of a campaign against the club.
Then again, there is literally not a single news outlet in the sport that hasn’t been deemed to be part of the rag dipper media conspiracy so I don’t know why I even bother pointing out when someone talks that bollocks for the 8,000th time.
As I said on here maybe 6 months ago, there were always going to be changes as Utd have a new owner who wants to spend, the Saudis at Newcastle want to spend,They are all over the fucking place. Is no-one piloting the PL Titanic before it hits an enormous iceberg?
They have an expensive executive structure that needs to be doing a better (sorry, much less bad) job.