It’s us vs all
Can't beat us on the pitch so have to try and beat us off it!!
It’s us vs all
Only hope we are not in it ;)Clearly been written based on a leak from a rival premier league club rather than City.
Which bodes well, given they wouldn’t leak it now if they were confident they would win the case.
It seems City are burning down the house.
They are on the PL’s side. One on our side, which is obviously NewcastleAccording to the Express City have invited other clubs to come forward. 12 have stepped up so far!
7-9 to be pedantic (since 19 other clubs)It says between 10 and 12 clubs. So between 6 and 8 haven’t
November for 115 Charges then... 6 week trial! Fun times ahead..
Says between 10 -12 have come forward either as a witness or in support of the.prem so I'd say it's moreIt’s just one I think.
I always get the feeling we’ve got a plan with what we do though, nothing done just for the sake of it.My gut reaction to this is that we’re not on very strong ground here and that we might lose this action.
If that happens, the whattaboutery around 115 will ramp up off the charts, despite the two cases having nothing to do with each other.
Is that your best effort for your 115th post?Not a good sign for me, sounds like it's a last gasp attempt to throw off a bad outcome from the 115
Were Newcastle in a similar position to ourselves when ffp was introduced by Uefa. They would have wanted to challenge it, but the time that it would have taken to over turn it would have been detrimental to NUFC especially after waiting 3 years for the EPL to accept the Saudi takeover.
Yeah. The Times article is written to make our claim seem unreasonable (eg why shouldn't deals be valued at FMV?) But to get a real view, we need to look at the actual text of our complaint not a media paraphrasing.I always get the feeling we’ve got a plan with what we do though, nothing done just fir the sake of it.
I think we are on incredibly strong ground , how on earth do the pl think they have a right to tell a company what they can pay anyone for a sponsorship deal and what is the pls defence that its unfair that this team makes more money than that team, how are the dippers, rags, and arsenal going to justify the standard chartered, team viewer and rwandan deals as fair market valueMy gut reaction to this is that we’re not on very strong ground here and that we might lose this action.
If that happens, the whattaboutery around 115 will ramp up off the charts, despite the two cases having nothing to do with each other.
please someone break it down really really simply. this good or bad for us regarding 115
That’s how I’m reading it too.Why? The two issues are different. Indeed, this could be a further warning to the PL that we are not taking anymore shit