FMV on their sponsorship deals ?What evidence could other clubs possibly have that they can step forward with.
Sack it off mate, they've only got cold feta and spinach ones left now and they look like they've been around the block a couple of times!!I'm still in the halftime pie queue :(
Rabin pointing this out…
First thing that crossed my mind as well..If I was a "glass half empty" person, I could be thinking that the main case isn't going well, and that we're now going down this route.
We lodged this action back in February, at which point I don’t think the panel had been picked, had it?If I was a "glass half empty" person, I could be thinking that the main case isn't going well, and that we're now going down this route.
Where is the press release from the club!?!!
I’m not misremembering here am I? both Everton and Forest issued press releases and both on and off the record briefings when they launched their appeals.
City sue the PL and its radio silence. No one to explain what’s happening or why, or shape the discussion.
It will take 3 months for the public to realise this isn’t about the 115 charges case and even then half of them will mistakenly think it still is.
I am at Alicante tonight : )
;)Off tomorrow Santa Pola.
And all because the red shirt mard arses aren’t winning anymoreWhat a mess
Surely they are guilty of with holding information then. Funny how the Pl which in reality is the 3 Red Cunts Spurs plus a few deluded clubs suddenly declare their members have damning information on one of its own members. The house of cards is about to collapseWhat evidence could other clubs possibly have that they can step forward with.
Think you have knocked your glass off the table and smashed it.If I was a "glass half empty" person, I could be thinking that the main case isn't going well, and that we're now going down this route.
Simon Jordan will be jetting back from Majorca to host a 4 hour special on Talkshite.In Feb new rules were brought in, at the behest of the redshirts and spurs, that gave the PL very broad powers to stop investment on the flimsiest of 'associations' between club owners and potential sponsors.
So not the Related Party rules but the new Associated Party rules.
The club is taking action against these new rules and are pointing out that they are being used against clubs with Gulf State connections.
That's what I have taken from it.
The story in the Time's is typically written in emotive language that puts City in a bad light and somehow connects these challenges with the 115 charges.
City have so far said nothing so expect the usual suspects in the media to criticise us, see it as a diversion and delaying tactic, etc, etc.
Presumably only clubs at the same level could do anything like that and they probably have bigger ones. I don’t get why 6/7 other clubs other than the usual suspects would get involved. Maybe it just makes the article sound better and more convincing! All successful sports players get more sponsorship than those that aren’t.FMV on their sponsorship deals ?
Maybe the mods should ban you ;)If I was a "glass half empty" person, I could be thinking that the main case isn't going well, and that we're now going down this route.