Eccles Blue
Well-Known Member
I thought we just played the best football ever and upset the other teams because they couldn't beat us on the football field? I now retire. :-)
His companies do but he doesn't and I don't blame him.Yes I would pay tax.
Yes. At least that is what was reported and most people are running with.I bow to your professional knowledge in this and it's perhaps because I've had to skip most of the thread, but are you saying that it's not being heard by a proper court room with a real judge or judges? I'm still talking about City's claim that was launched in Feb and leaked yesterday?
They leaked it, or at least one of their surrogate acolytesYou have to ‘admire’ Liverpool to some extent. The influence they have over the media and the favours they can call in, seemingly at the click of their fingers, is breathtaking in many ways. The timing of this leak and the selective nature of the way it’s being reported and linked (erroneously) with the ongoing allegations is incredibly fortuitous for them … anyone remember that bank who allegedly help fund terror organisations? It’s only been 24 hours and I’m buggered if I remember their name!
His companies do but he doesn't and I don't blame him.
Oh I thought suing was done it the courts of the land. I'm confused lol
They leaked it, or at least one of their surrogate acolytes
The articles are using the wrong terminology I think. Not for the first time.
Sorry mate not seen relevant info, so who is conducting this hearing then?Yes. At least that is what was reported and most people are running with.
And I have no professional knowledge on legal stuff. Pretty sure this is right, though.
But he was no Max WoosnamThe only man to have come on late in the cup final and scored a hat trick having scored a century for England before lunch at Lords. Suspect he won an Olympic gold the same day.
Don't worry about it. I'm a thick **** too.Are City taking legal action against the pl ? Would this be heard in court ?
I'm thick lol
Of his time….He wasn’t a great husband tbf.
Yes, clearly, but there are some very well embedded and getting in the odd jab.Just skimming through posts, i see many of the "worried we are losing" people seems to have only recently joined....hmmm!
We could do a mix of black and red chips to replicate our past away kit colours.Our chips would appear to be all in on this...maybe black not red though..
We'll see..
Cheers.Yes. At least that is what was reported and most people are running with.
And I have no professional knowledge on legal stuff. Pretty sure this is right, though.
I'm sure our owners are globally aware of any of our enemies dark traits.Levy that bastion of integrity who has been employed by many years by someone who has just been convicted of insider trading, this is what makes me laugh about the pl in general they all act like they are the absolute pinnacle of moral integrity and are trying to save football from the evil that is manchester city while all being dirtier than most, this is the absolute dictionary definition of those in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.
I think if City can land their allegations of discriminatory actions by the EPL it must weaken their 115 allegations against the club. Although the allegations will stand or fall on evidence, there are real questions to be answered around the framing (i.e. weaponising) of the charges, the advance briefing to Ziegler (to hit the press as City were still being advised of the charges) in terms of how it came to be done that way, who authorised it and why etc. We have been singled out for "special treatment" and I'd guess there will be a good amount of evidence. Pep calling out Levy happened for a reason.This is nothing to do with the 115 allegations. There is no link whatsoever, imho....
What connection do you see?