14 isn't technically the number required. It's 70 per cent majority of the teams in the league. Which equates to 14 teams.Watched Stefan on talkSPORT I wonder if the tyranny of majority vote is down to the fact you are supposed to have 14 to get a vote through, now back in Feb didnt only 12 vote yes, 6 no and 2 abstained but it was still carried! Maybe this is the point, it shouldn’t be carried unless 14 is hit. If 14 can’t be got then the vote is void until it’s reached because you could effectively have say the red tops vote yes 3 votes, City no, the rest abstain it would then be carried!
Meanwhile, the Premier League introduces new rules to distort the market...
![]()
Premier League: Clubs vote to trial new spending cap system
Premier League clubs have voted to bring in a new spending cap system on a trial basis for the 2024-25 season.www.bbc.co.uk
"Premier League clubs have agreed to trial an alternative financial system which operates like a spending cap in the 2024-25 season.
The Squad Cost Rules (SCR) and Top to Bottom Anchoring Rules (TBA) will operate alongside the existing Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) on a "non-binding basis".
Teams will be allowed to spend no more than 85% of their total revenues on squads under the new system.
Meanwhile, the TBA is an anchoring model based on the earnings of the bottom club."
The exact rules to be determined once the EPL have found a way for City to have breached them, while certain other clubs haven't.
I don't want to be a party pooper but listening to that, how is this explained?
Newcastle have finalised a £25m-a-year front-of-shirt sponsorship deal with the leading Saudi Arabian events company Sela. The agreement will provide an early test of the Premier League’s new fair market value commercial regulations.
First question he should be askedDoes Mr Byrne have a view on Liverpool accepting blood money for the last two decades?
Legendary responseHave left this reply to our Mr Darke's tweet...
"As a staunch fan of MCFC, I am not in the least embarrassed by the behaviour of our club.Now, I would be embarrassed if my clubs sponsors were found guilty of laundering money for terrorist organizations; or if my clubs fans were guilty of causing the deaths of Italian fans"
Ian Byrne, yet another nut job Scouser, and MP, is probably going to take it to PM’s question time. Lol! :-)
But under these new rules will be thrown out as related party.That's fair market value if look at other sponsors
How about renaming them all SCAACMeanwhile, the Premier League introduces new rules to distort the market...
![]()
Premier League: Clubs vote to trial new spending cap system
Premier League clubs have voted to bring in a new spending cap system on a trial basis for the 2024-25 season.www.bbc.co.uk
"Premier League clubs have agreed to trial an alternative financial system which operates like a spending cap in the 2024-25 season.
The Squad Cost Rules (SCR) and Top to Bottom Anchoring Rules (TBA) will operate alongside the existing Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) on a "non-binding basis".
Teams will be allowed to spend no more than 85% of their total revenues on squads under the new system.
Meanwhile, the TBA is an anchoring model based on the earnings of the bottom club."
The exact rules to be determined once the EPL have found a way for City to have breached them, while certain other clubs haven't.
It’s the law in the Independent Republic of Not England.Why are scousers always scruffy cunts, moaning bastards and complete mardarses?
Long time reader....first time poster. I'm expecting to be branded a rag any moment!!! Bring it on.
It occurs to me that City and Newcastle could simply broker a mutually beneficial arrangement by which Etihad sponsor Newcastle and a Saudi equivalent sponsors City. It would boil an ocean of urine!
Very cunning indeed, I was thinking there might be an advantageous little loophole somewhere..Long time reader....first time poster. I'm expecting to be branded a rag any moment!!! Bring it on.
It occurs to me that City and Newcastle could simply broker a mutually beneficial arrangement by which Etihad sponsor Newcastle and a Saudi equivalent sponsors City. It would boil an ocean of urine!
No tested for FMV which the PL put at £0.56But under these new rules will be thrown out as related party.
Ian Byrne, yet another nut job Scouser, and MP, is probably going to take it to PM’s question time. Lol! :-)
Has he ever set foot in the Etihad or had anything positive to say about City? After all we contribute millions a year to his council. If we hadn’t taken on the stadium it would have cost millions a year to maintain or multi millions to demolish.It was only a matter of time before the populist rent a **** made a comment.
Meanwhile, Manchester Mayor who was very vocal when his club Everton were under attack from the PL had said fuck all about the vicious attack on City.
If I remember rightly he got a free ticket to the first game back after covid to watch his beloved Everton, when 40 odd thousand genuine City fans weren't allowed inHas he ever set foot in the Etihad or had anything positive to say about City? After all we contribute millions a year to his council. If we hadn’t taken on the stadium it would have cost millions a year to maintain or multi millions to demolish.