bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Did he mention the bit about he and his pals trying to block the new stadium for New York City FC with a toxic media campaign.I read that as a mild super league threat .
Did he mention the bit about he and his pals trying to block the new stadium for New York City FC with a toxic media campaign.I read that as a mild super league threat .
They will try to disallow the profits from our hotel eventually.Won't be long until they ban the ability of adding the money from other venues, such as indoor arenas, to total revenue.
Is this the first time this arbitration process has been used? or just the first time it has been leaked?
What I find more amusing is all those clubs and fans supporting these red cartels ,are they in a cult or the reasoning logic has disappeared from their brain cells?The Red shirt Yanks at Liverpool, United and Arsenal want to crush City and want to take over the PL.
View attachment 121620
What I find more amusing is all those clubs and fans supporting these red cartels ,are they in a cult or the reasoning logic has disappeared from their brain cells?
Will this have any effect on this years transfer market in this country,
And City would have no problem with any of that would we?
The MSM media narrative that we are trying to establish a free for all where we could spend what we like is just nonsense (I hope I'm right on this point). After all if that was the case I think Newcastle's Saudi PIF would blow us out of the water.
For anyone interested.
He did a good job pooh-poohing most of the nonsense, but at the end he missed the chance to shut the noise about the EFL deal up. Shame that.
Chapman was OK. Logan had no idea.
Well we know who the yank public will want to see most...The Red shirt Yanks at Liverpool, United and Arsenal want to crush City and want to take over the PL.
View attachment 121620
The latter.Is this the first time this arbitration process has been used? or just the first time it has been leaked?
Am I right in thinking that if City win, the world doesn't end, and we (English football) reverts to the situation as it was before the February ammendment kicked in?
By which I mean that clubs are only allowed to spend what they earn (from sponsorship, broadcast, matchday and competition prize money) and FMV is determined by the same calculation that UEFA use?
I suppose that's a question for any of our experts but you seem to have a good handle on all this and I didn,'t think that came across in the podcast.
Remember… we’re the bad guys
Thanks for posting. It seemed clear to me that this discussion was not informed by sight of the claim document. I don’t think the discussion added anything to the debate, it was lightweight compared to the Maguire podcast but at least it tried to be somewhat more balanced than Lawton’s original hit-piece.
Would the CEO's be included in the salary cap?
Would the cleaners, ticket office, accountants, managers, physios, and every other employee in the club be on a salary cap?
Or just the people who sit front and ctr delivering the entertainment the masses pay for?
Would you accept a salary cap at work? If your salary was capped, would you be looking for a new job?
Well we know who the yank public will want to see most...
Salary caps means losing your best players.Would the CEO's be included in the salary cap?
Would the cleaners, ticket office, accountants, managers, physios, and every other employee in the club be on a salary cap?
Or just the people who sit front and ctr delivering the entertainment the masses pay for?
Would you accept a salary cap at work? If your salary was capped, would you be looking for a new job?
You are correct.Am I right in thinking that if City win, the world doesn't end, and we (English football) reverts to the situation as it was before the February ammendment kicked in?
By which I mean that clubs are only allowed to spend what they earn (from sponsorship, broadcast, matchday and competition prize money) and FMV is determined by the same calculation that UEFA use?
I suppose that's a question for any of our experts but you seem to have a good handle on all this and I didn,'t think that came across in the podcast.
Hope the ones not appointed spill the beansThe problem being that Masters is neither competent nor impartial, seeing that he was appointed following approval from the rags and dippers.
The fact that other candidates declined to accept the post, suggests that everything was possibly not above board, and their principles would not allow them to take the job.
Masters, on the other hand, seemed to have no qualms about being used as a puppet to carry out the cabal's wishes, however corrupt or distorted.
Remember… we’re the bad guys