You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
Under a rock in the Mojave desert.Richard Masters is very quiet these days and has become a recluse, he used to love the limelight didn’t he ? Same for that slippery snake Rick Parry ! Where the fuck is he hiding ?????
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
Hopefully when he was playing for Sunderland and not us, otherwise 116 incomming...Niall Quinn, tarnished my arse.
Yup, whatever deal they made. CFG bought into the project 25% iirc.CfG get the % of the income of the co op?
Kinkybyname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 4,151
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Shindler's fistShindlers next book?
Yup, whatever deal they made. CFG bought into the project 25% iirc.
Ha right didn't know that cheers
TedofChume
Well-Known Member
I don't know mate, but I think he either reads this forum or has had a look through my website because he mentions at times some of the points I've made.Has @slbsn seen this? Any views Stefan?
I'm really pushed for time at the moment, but have a few belting videos up my sleeve which when I've finished them are going to expose this shit-shower for what it really is.
BBC: Premier League chief Richard Masters told BBC Sport in August that it was "time to revolve" City's long-running case.
I always knew Masters was a dirty rat!
I always knew Masters was a dirty rat!
They likely are time barredMancini Charges
A very interesting thread on @slbsn X feed, basically given the PL rules circa 2009 and the LCFC ruling yesterday the PL's chances of landing the Mancini charges are highly unlikely. However, once again, I'll ask if anyone can explain why are the Mancini charges not time barred. There was absolutely NOTHING criminal about the contracts I.e. to stop them being time barred. Is it possible they have already been resolved and thrown out. I know they could be classed as minor charges but if they were fasely raised against us it needs calling out. It adds weight to our arguments about vexatious litigation by commercial rivals.
My views have not changed. But everyone should be aware of the risk in any case. I have said this over and over. Don't be too certain about anything.Can I ask you a question Stefan? Having just watched you on Talksport you didn't seem as confident with regards to our case as before. Am I right or are you still thinking that it will be really difficult for the independent panel to find us guilty of what they are accusing us of.
Having listened to you many times on talkshite I’m now one million percent certain that Jordan is a bellend.My views have not changed. But everyone should be aware of the risk in any case. I have said this over and over. Don't be too certain about anything.
Might not help our case though : )
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
Goes back to the '69 cup final.Leicester City are my new second team.
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes, complete with high class totty bounding out of the top.Did we relent and give him a cake off the books?
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
This depends on which teams he didn't want to see ruined....After we’ve wiped the floor with them there should be a full & open enquiry.
I’d love to see Masters questioned about the motivations he had as the CEO to try & ruin clubs whilst stating he aim was to ensure clubs don’t get ruined.
NorCalBlue
Well-Known Member
But 115 is part of our brand now! If it was reduced to 106 or something, it wouldn't be the same :-(Mancini Charges
A very interesting thread on @slbsn X feed, basically given the PL rules circa 2009 and the LCFC ruling yesterday the PL's chances of landing the Mancini charges are highly unlikely. However, once again, I'll ask if anyone can explain why are the Mancini charges not time barred. There was absolutely NOTHING criminal about the contracts I.e. to stop them being time barred. Is it possible they have already been resolved and thrown out. I know they could be classed as minor charges but if they were fasely raised against us it needs calling out. It adds weight to our arguments about vexatious litigation by commercial rivals.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
My views have not changed. But everyone should be aware of the risk in any case. I have said this over and over. Don't be too certain about anything.
Can we be certain United are shite? Or do we have to do a Darth Vader and search our feelings?
we are really here
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 73
Isn't the investigation self reported by the new ownership about abramovich eras accounting?Self reported?
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Expect the unexpected .My views have not changed. But everyone should be aware of the risk in any case. I have said this over and over. Don't be too certain about anything.
LeonardoDaVnci
Well-Known Member
Yes that's true, and I do love the mathematical coincidence going around...But 115 is part of our brand now! If it was reduced to 106 or something, it wouldn't be the same :-(
City PL champions in 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 = 115, and 5 in a row ! (hopefully)
That would be a lovely banner for 1894 to produce the next time our Alison comes a callin..