Of course they will, I belive it's called Pavlov's Red Dog effect.Are sky media going to mention this every day by saying "this is day 2 of the 115" then go through the severe punishment we will get and never mention what will happen if we are cleared!
It would have up until the point that leicester did them on the wording of the rules and how there is nothing in them that suggests that those accounts be accurate.I’d read that, think it was yesterday mate.
Looks pretty straightforward to bat away but I still can’t get my head round them charging us with something we can very easily squash.
Them - you didn’t file the accounts on time / properly.
Us - yes we did. Here they are. Here are the communications between us where we sent them to you. Here are the communications from you saying thanks everything sweet.
Seems a fucking bizarre thing for them to do!
I can't remember the wording of the Pearce e-mail that ever so conveniently surfaced a couple of weeks or so after the CAS verdict didn't go the way that Der Spiegel wanted, but I always thought this question of "arranging payments on behalf of ADUG" was specifically about disguised equity funding and not to do with any other payments he may or may not have arranged.I believe the Pearce email, as I said a few days ago, is a complete red-herring. The question is whether Etihad sponsorship is disguised equity investment.
As per CAS, we know it isn't and that email doesn't alter that. It was just mischief making and misdirection.
Guilty of not being guilty?They need to find us guilty of something if just to satisfy the red shirts
They do seem to run the PL though.dont confuse what they want to happen with what will happen, the red shirts dont run the country as much as people think they do
Are sky media going to mention this every day by saying "this is day 2 of the 115" then go through the severe punishment we will get and never mention what will happen if we are cleared!
not for longThey do seem to run the PL though.
Every paragraph of Roan’s article is twisted and distorted. Subtle changes. He refers to the CAS judgement statement using the phrase: “No conclusive evidence” The actual phrase used repeatedly by CAS was: “No evidence.” Fundamentally dishonest reporting.
I’ve been looking forward to this. I’m aware of how shit it could be if things don’t go our way but the feeling if we win will probably be third only to the Aguero moment and UCL
Unless I have missed it, wasn't all this detail suppose to come out in the public domain with Etihad floating on the New York stock exchange.I believe the Pearce email, as I said a few days ago, is a complete red-herring. The question is whether Etihad sponsorship is disguised equity investment.
As per CAS, we know it isn't and that email doesn't alter that. It was just mischief making and misdirection.
he works for the rags and dippers so he is doing it for 5 pound an hr and lunch because he supported them when he was littleDo we know how much an hour the prem league KC is on, seems strange they only mention Pannicks made up fee.
Do we know how much an hour the prem league KC is on, seems strange they only mention Pannicks made up fee.
We’ll see things they’ll never see.No matter what the outcome nothing can take away the wonderful feelings we felt at the time over the last 15 years.
MUTV probably.Will the hearing be streamed live on the old Dodgy box?
Yes City have said they have proof from the start of their innocence.This is just the beginning. Buckle in for the next few months. Fuck everyone and focus on City, Lord Pannick and his crew.
They’ve got this.
Not on my telly they won’t. Binned Sky Sports , Talksport with pictures.Are sky media going to mention this every day by saying "this is day 2 of the 115" then go through the severe punishment we will get and never mention what will happen if we are cleared!