Tbf, as soon as Khaldoon and Pearce became involved, the private ownership argument, while it may be true, flew out of the window where income is concerned. That doesn't mean we can't use it as an argument against the idea that the club is state-owned, state-funded, state-sponsored or whatever the latest watered down version is, it clearly isn't, but we can't pretend the club isn't in a much stronger position with a lot more large company contacts than any other club is, with the exception of Newcastle, and we aren't far below them.
See my previous post for why, and why I don't care.
I thought he hit the right tone to be honest with you............That’s a bit fucking harsh, even by bluemoon standards
I doubt Everton fans have much time for Wyness, he did what might be called a "Swales" and outsourced the catering and club shop rights and tried to flog the training ground for housing.Keith *** cough *** Wyness. Cough, cough.
I hope City do win the APT case against the PL, but is it possible that the panel haven't concluded proceedings yet, and that is why the PL amended the agenda at Thursday's meeting?
But let’s not forget the Rags & Arsenal know how to use politics to influence decisions. Both have had Keir Starmer sat in the stands for the last month & will have used those opportunities for lobbying.
Either Spitty is thick and ignorant or is just being told to pander to the equally thick and ignorant plastic lemmings and tell them what they want to hear.I absolutely agree that large companies would want to be involved with the best club in world football, and Carragher's ignorance is embarrassing.
The fact remains that our owners and Newcastle's owners have direct, and indirect control, over many times the wealth of any other owners, so describing that as an issue related to the current Middle Eastern owned clubs, is legitimate.
Nothing on the BBC about us this morning. Surprise surprise.Has there though?
Or have the BBC just made shit up to further reinforce their own position (i.e big bad City with all their state wealth might vs poor little fair to all our PL)
There’s been no statement from the club, other than a spokesman saying “As you know, we are not in a position to comment…”.
Lawton is clearly well connected though, with one of his close colleagues being married to Arsenal’s CCO, so I think it’s naive to suggest that he’s purely guessing here. I imagine he’ll know the mood music around the PL about how the hearing went.
Carragher on these you tube shows he does always tries to come across as fair and level headed, but deep down lies a nasty fucker with a deep hatred for City, same as Neville tries to act impartial but the reality is he's a city hater through and through, and both would be dancing a jig if we got charged and ended up relegatedEither Spitty is thick and ignorant or is just being told to pander to the equally thick and ignorant plastic lemmings and tell them what they want to hear.
If Spitty couldn't play football he'd be making a living dealing drugs to vulnerable kids or selling knock off gear from the back of a van as he's basically a scroat.
I doubt Everton fans have much time for Wyness, he did what might be called a "Swales" and outsourced the catering and club shop rights and tried to flog the training ground for housing.
Let’s not make this cretin anymore famous or infamous than he is. Don’t click on any links for media outlets quoting him. My granddaughter is 2 years old she has more idea about football & City matters than this failed excuse for a football executiveKeith *** cough *** Wyness. Cough, cough.
Absolutely 100%.Carragher on these you tube shows he does always tries to come across as fair and level headed, but deep down lies a nasty fucker with a deep hatred for City, same as Neville tries to act impartial but the reality is he's a city hater through and through, and both would be dancing a jig if we got charged and ended up relegated
I'm feeling totally out of the loop but why was there a vote in the first case regarding amendments to the APT rules, given our (presumably) ongoing case against the PL?He actually goes as far as to openly say he/the Times are only guessing.
It is just one interpretation of two very loosely related events. As much as I would want it to be that one, I thonk it is a reach to try add more 'knowledge' of mood to it. To this particular claim, at least.
To be fair it sounds like the penny is starting to drop with this one.Anyone would think they have just got a new owner and dream of him pumping hundreds of millions into the club to make it great again!!
Totally agree but it's taken far too long for them to realise this.To be fair it sounds like thrle penny is starting to drop with this one.
Once he realises the rules made up by his vile and entitled neighbours and their equally vile and entitled fellow red shirts will severely limit what new owners can invest, he'll understand fully what's been happening for years right in front of his eyes.
Feels to me (wishful thinking?) they were feeling bullish and no longer do.I'm feeling totally out of the loop but why was there a vote in the first case regarding amendments to the APT rules, given our (presumably) ongoing case against the PL?