President Trump

Have you read it? Essentially evidence of russian attempted fiddling aplenty, but nothing they could really pin on the orange one.
That is in no way an accurate summary of the Mueller report. That is the summary Trump claimed, but it is not at all what the report says.
 
Have you read it? Essentially evidence of russian attempted fiddling aplenty, but nothing they could really pin on the orange one.
I think you're nuts. You essentially self-radicalised during the pandemic and became obsessed. It happened to a lot of internet dwellers at that time. Getting so visibly emotional about an election in a country far away is in itself pretty nuts.
Wile they didn't pin it on him there was clear evidence of intent and a cover up.
"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," the report says.
The evidence "about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred," Mueller adds.
Furthermore, Mueller makes it clear his investigators would have said there was no obstruction if they could demonstrate it: "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state."
Mueller reports that because aides and advisers to Trump refused to "carry out orders," the President was prevented from influencing the special counsel's investigation.
Here's the relevant line: "The President's efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests."
 
He's taking apart the Republican heritage at such a great pace and precision that the only explanation is him being a democrat agent...

Very interesting from an outside view that the US Blue/Red hatred is so fundamental that the risk being called a traitor - criticizing one of your 'own' - to be much worse than completely ruining the own party.
 
Last edited:
Have you read it? Essentially evidence of russian attempted fiddling aplenty, but nothing they could really pin on the orange one.
I think you're nuts. You essentially self-radicalised during the pandemic and became obsessed. It happened to a lot of internet dwellers at that time. Getting so visibly emotional about an election in a country far away is in itself pretty nuts.
You can think whatever you wish about me, I value your opinion slightly below that of my friend’s pet goldfish.
 
It's getting increasingly hard to understand him, he just keeps repeating words and doesn't end sentences before starting another. Rambling ****.
That’s what happens when your dick exists in place of your brain and it’s very small and probably doesn’t work anymore.
 
It's getting increasingly hard to understand him, he just keeps repeating words and doesn't end sentences before starting another. Rambling ****.
I wonder if this is a function of him falling behind in the polls, by it creating some sort of viscous (arguably virtuous!) circle with his already dysfunctional brain. Whether the desperation he must be feeling is causing his mind to further degenerate.

I did feel that he would become increasingly incoherent as the election loomed and his latest output would certainly support that view.
 
That is in no way an accurate summary of the Mueller report. That is the summary Trump claimed, but it is not at all what the report says.
He’s clearly a secret admirer of Trump so it’s unsurprising that he would use Trump’s summary. Can’t be any other reason why he regularly tries to minimise Trump’s venality. He certainly doesn’t bother trying to establish the facts.
 
I wonder if this is a function of him falling behind in the polls, by it creating some sort of viscous (arguably virtuous!) circle with his already dysfunctional brain. Whether the desperation he must be feeling is causing his mind to further degenerate.

I did feel that he would become increasingly incoherent as the election loomed and his latest output would certainly support that view.
It's a pantomime campaign in a lot of ways -- he has no platform, no new ideas, or at least no practical solutions to problems. It's the same tired greatest hits. He doesn't prepare, and he doesn't care. He's relying on the cult of personality and the fact that plenty of his constituents won't leave him because he's a Republican and Harris isn't. As with so many of his failed ventures, he loses interest and leans on blame, excuses and lawyers to rationaliz(s)e his failures, and will do again if he doesn't win, as we know. Add to that that whether due to exogenous pressures or age or both that he's losing his marbles and I cannot see how he drives a resurgent campaign, absent a Harris gaffe. She's leaning on Democrat grass roots organiz(s)ation now to drive turnout in the swing states and operating a Hippocratic oath campaign -- "first, do no harm." The last major hurdle will be Walz tomorrow night -- he can't screw up the debate against Vance, and I don't think he will.
 
He’s clearly a secret admirer of Trump so it’s unsurprising that he would use Trump’s summary. Can’t be any other reason why he regularly tries to minimise Trump’s venality. He certainly doesn’t bother trying to establish the facts.
Naw, he's no Trumpy -- he's simply irritated, frustrated and disappointed that he can't stay above the fray and critici(s)ze both sides equally, like the true periodically-smug-and-trollish misanthrope he is. He has enough common sense to recogniz(s)e that. He's not a fucking hopeless wanking moron like the other two.
 
Last edited:
It's getting increasingly hard to understand him, he just keeps repeating words and doesn't end sentences before starting another. Rambling ****.
I note he’s not used Person, Woman, Man, Camera, TV in this campaign yet.

It’d probably go Person, Hannibal Lector, Dogs, Impaired, Why’s everybody gone home? this time around though.
 
Naw, he's no Trumpy -- he's simply irritated, frustrated and disappointed that he can't stay above the fray and critici(s)ze both sides equally, like the true periodically-smug-and-trollish misanthrope he is. He has enough common sense to recogniz(s)e that. He's not a fucking hopeless wanking moron like the other two.
“Troll” is so much more concise.

Though, I do think he has become a Trump apologist in practice.

He’ll no doubt soon post a treatise on why calling Harris “mentally-disabled” and suggesting a “Purge”-like criminal justice policy are completely reasonable assertions, not in any way a sign of a disturbed person unfit for high office, and anyone saying otherwise is “self-radicalised”.
 
“Troll” is so much more concise.

Though, I do think he has become a Trump apologist in practice.

He’ll no doubt soon post a treatise on why calling Harris “mentally-disabled” and suggesting a “Purge”-like criminal justice policy are completely reasonable assertions, not in any way a sign of a disturbed person unfit for high office, and anyone saying otherwise is “self-radicalised”.
I'm guessing you are referring to the individual who must feature highly on the list of blocked accounts on here?
 
Naw, he's no Trumpy -- he's simply irritated, frustrated and disappointed that he can't stay above the fray and critici(s)ze both sides equally, like the true periodically-smug-and-trollish misanthrope he is. He has enough common sense to recogniz(s)e that. He's not a fucking hopeless wanking moron like the other two.
Yeah, that's the conclusion I came to. Stuck him on ignore for a while thinking he was MAGA, LOL.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top