City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

halfcenturyup said:
www.footballinsider247.com

Newcastle face devastating blow after Man City update - Stefan Borson

Football Insider has been told by Stefan Borson Newcastle United are facing a devastating blow after a Man City update.
www.footballinsider247.com www.footballinsider247.com

"It doesn’t look like City have prevailed in the way that would be particularly useful to Newcastle,” Borson told Football Insider.

“If City have only managed to get a concession in respect of the databank, I don’t think that’s going to move the dial where Newcastle are concerned.""
Click to expand...

Ah I see so it's just a comment of the database thing as that's literally all anyone knows. The press have jumped on it and it's a nothing comment really
 
Norbiton said:
I assumed it was based on the Premier League meeting where they withdrew proposed changes to the database on sponsorships but didn’t revise any of the changes made in February which City were challenging
Click to expand...

I suppose that is most likely. I was just trying to hear from the horse's mouth whether it was just that, in which case it can probably be ignored (as the PL themselves have said the proposed change was dropped after comments from several clubs), or whether there was more to it, in which case it could be important.
 
halfcenturyup said:
I am sure he just repeats what he is told like all these other "journalists". The problem is what he is told and by who.

Which is why I was trying to find out if there were any other sources of that rumour that we don't know about. I guess not.
Click to expand...
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
 
slbsn said:
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, that's all I was trying to understand. Thanks.
 
slbsn said:
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Click to expand...

His sources on CAS were simply impeccable.
 
jrb said:
Not having a pop at Slbsn as he stands up for the club and the fans regularly. But just like Big Steve, who's involved with Neville and Carragher via Overlap, and the Rag, Coach Wreckers, and Gooner Youtubers, there are certain red shirt pundits, Red Shirt fans, and media outlets you shouldn't get involved with, who have an agenda against City, no matter what you get offered.
Click to expand...

I don't mind Steve doing it as he has an absolute gift for shit talking he wipes the floor with them.
 
slbsn said:
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Click to expand...
The problem with Panja is that in the past he has been fed false information by bad actors. A lot of his doomsday content was shown to be untrue at CAS. He does have senior sources at MUFC and LFC but some of the leaks have been malicious and untrue. Panja has been happy to publish with no wider context.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
The problem with Panja is that in the past he has been fed false information by bad actors. A lot of his doomsday content was shown to be untrue at CAS. He does have senior sources at MUFC and LFC but some of the leaks have been malicious and untrue. Panja has been happy to publish with no wider context.
Click to expand...
The problem with Panja was that he aligned himself with the WhatsApp muppets early on in the UEFA charges kerfuffle and wouldn't entertain any other view. The fact that his paymasters had links into FSG was purely coincidental as well I'm sure.
 
JRockBlues said:
The problem with Panja was that he aligned himself with the WhatsApp muppets early on in the UEFA charges kerfuffle and wouldn't entertain any other view. The fact that his paymasters had links into FSG was purely coincidental as well I'm sure.
Click to expand...
Make me a fool once, I'll laugh.

Try and do it again & again, you can fuck right off.
 
slbsn said:
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Click to expand...
He has good sources but he had Benjie Mendy “guilty” on numerous counts of rape / sexual assault. Obviously, Mendy was acquitted of the charges (by jury).

Regarding the APT case. Even if the Prem have won the bulk of the case that seems quite likely, Panja dismissing the database issue could be a bit misleading. Databases tend to be built to support business objectives, rather than be stand alone resources. I think it’s unlikely that the panel would have deemed the database to be wrong / unlawful without finding a flaw in the underpinning policy. We don’t know fo sure as we haven’t seen the ruling.
 
slbsn said:
I spoke to multiple sources on APT in addition to reading Panja’s tweet. Whilst it is important to weigh the personal feelings of the tweeters, it is worth considering what he writes about a topic like this because he undoubtedly has some good sources. As I said, in any event, the quote considers the situation “if” he is correct.
Click to expand...

All true and fair but it's also worth considering that he's a jumped up bitter **** who hates our club and every single thing connected to it
 
Damocles said:
All true and fair but it's also worth considering that he's a jumped up bitter **** who hates our club and every single thing connected to it
Click to expand...
Most of the info leaked to Panja has been designed to damage City. It has been biased and distorted. He has presented it as fact when he knows full well the motive of those who have leaked it. That is fundamentally dishonest.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Most of the info leaked to Panja has been designed to damage City. It has been biased and distorted. He has presented it as fact when he knows full well the motive of those who have leaked it. That is fundamentally dishonest.
Click to expand...
I used to know a person who told lies most of the time.
I never found a reliable way to decide which was which when he spoke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top