City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

SiMCFC said:
So what you are saying is, its ok for your Owner to invest money in the Club? Interesting.
Click to expand...
Actually I don't think it's OK and I think the revised ruling is fair enough.

I just like to watch my team play football mate, the rest of it isn't something I involve myself in too much. If the rules change then so be it. Maybe we've got a hotel somewhere we could sell.
 
SebastianBlue said:
Sharing this highlighted screenshot of the ENTIRE ruling summary of the 175-page APT rules challenge decision for ease of sharing with acquaintances, mates, coworkers, family members, social media personalities, and passerbys on the street that may have only heard the Premier League pronouncements regarding the ruling:

IMG-1391.jpg


The full decision document:

Click to expand...
Yep, easy to see from that why some people are calling it a draw :)
 
Moss Side's Finest said:
I don't think that the entire BBC are out for us, but I do believe (as with Sky and TNT) they are riddled with ex red shirt scumbags who play to what they feel are the mainstream audience.
Click to expand...
BBC Sport in Salford certainly are, as was demonstrated clearly by their ludicrous article this afternoon
 
Moss Side's Finest said:
I don't think that the entire BBC are out for us, but I do believe (as with Sky and TNT) they are riddled with ex red shirt scumbags who play to what they feel are the mainstream audience.
Click to expand...

Whilst that is true, I said before they just don't have any staff with the ability to adequately comment on what has happened. They've taken the PL statement and our statement and assumed, as the governing body that the PL must have won.

I'm sure in the next few hours, having read other articles they will revise their position with a "what it means" and caveat the PL's position. Probably instead suggesting a doomsday scenario where we run amok and football is ruined.
 
bridgeno1 said:
Where I understand City might have the biggest issues are some allegations around City execs misrepresenting owner funding as sponsorship income. Anyway I'm far from an expert on this and it's only based on some things I've heard which are just as likely to be bollocks as not so please don't take this as my personal opinion, only a response to what I've heard are possibly the toughest of the 115 charges for City to overcome.
Click to expand...
This was all coved by CAS and they found no evidence so I'm not worried about this at all. The only thing that has me worried is Yaya's contract but that is a relative minor thing
 
bridgeno1 said:
Actually I don't think it's OK and I think the revised ruling is fair enough.

I just like to watch my team play football mate, the rest of it isn't something I involve myself in too much. If the rules change then so be it. Maybe we've got a hotel somewhere we could sell.
Click to expand...
Football? More like professional sitting down. Cheating cunts
 
Roachy said:
That PL statement is fucking comical, talk about trying to save face.
Click to expand...

gordondaviesmoustache said:
Absolutely fucking comical that the PL is claiming any sort of victory when its own rules, and their application of them, has unequivocally been deemed unlawful ffs!

Their own fucking rules ffs.
Click to expand...
I mean yeah it's obviously pathetic by the PL and whatnot, but it'll stick in the way that so many out there are adamant that City only won at CAS due to time-barring issues

Then again, that's a them issue. I'm certainly happier than they are with the outcome
 
SebastianBlue said:
Sharing this highlighted screenshot of the ENTIRE ruling summary of the 175-page APT rules challenge decision for ease of sharing with acquaintances, mates, coworkers, family members, social media personalities, and passerbys on the street that may have only heard the Premier League pronouncements regarding the ruling:

IMG-1391.jpg


The full decision document:

Click to expand...
The PL have got some fucking brass neck claiming any sort of victory given the number of times the word unlawful has been deployed there.
 
Even Stefan thought this was difficult for City to win. He will be happy to be proved wrong I suspect. I hope he is right about 115 though!
 
bridgeno1 said:
Where I understand City might have the biggest issues are some allegations around City execs misrepresenting owner funding as sponsorship income. Anyway I'm far from an expert on this and it's only based on some things I've heard which are just as likely to be bollocks as not so please don't take this as my personal opinion, only a response to what I've heard are possibly the toughest of the 115 charges for City to overcome.
Click to expand...
Same fucking shite as UEFA came up with, look how that one ended. Haven’t you got letters to write?
 
SebastianBlue said:
Sharing this highlighted screenshot of the ENTIRE ruling summary of the 175-page APT rules challenge decision for ease of sharing with acquaintances, mates, coworkers, family members, social media personalities, and passerbys on the street that may have only heard the Premier League pronouncements regarding the ruling:

IMG-1391.jpg


The full decision document:

Click to expand...
looks like the CAS doc, just need the 115 next and we have a Fuck You poster trilogy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top