The Stockport Iniesta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 11,827
What have Der Spiegel said though ;)Kicker.de German football site say City have won their case.
What have Der Spiegel said though ;)Kicker.de German football site say City have won their case.
I see some have “borrowed” this for twitterOhh Lord David Pannick, he is the fucking man
He is an academic, he's smarter than Jaap Stam
He works in the law courts for Guardiola's men
And when we win the 115 we'll sing this song again
Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.Whether they do or not I don't know. But there's a difference between a club's hierarchy and its fans. I've been getting dogs abuse on here (it's fine I'm thick skinned and I'm on a Man City forum after all so it's a case of Alice isn't in Kansas any more) but I'm not a representative of Arsenal Football Club I'm just a fan and have been my whole life so I think it would be cool if people could make that distinction. Making things personal isn't cool.
who said this - a name would be helpful for retributive purposesHe said we've failed in the majority of our legal challenges against the PL's ownership and sponsorship rules (ownership?) - disingenuous bastard - and then went on to add that it isn't directly related to the 115 charges
You repeatedly err repeat bollox about ‘time barred’, ‘disguised equity’ and now your latest ‘the PL have different info to what was presented at CAS’.Whether they do or not I don't know. But there's a difference between a club's hierarchy and its fans. I've been getting dogs abuse on here (it's fine I'm thick skinned and I'm on a Man City forum after all so it's a case of Alice isn't in Kansas any more) but I'm not a representative of Arsenal Football Club I'm just a fan and have been my whole life so I think it would be cool if people could make that distinction. Making things personal isn't cool.
Don't forget Visit Rwanda.Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.
Fuck that, it’s funny. We are cleared here.I would if I had a clue what is going on .
Ok I understand you point now.
Masters may well have inadvertantly helped destroy his credibility by pushing and losing the APT case.
I believe it clearly demonstrates that he has acted in bad faith towards City in his role as lackey for the redshirt cabal, and that may count heavily again the PL's charges made against us in the 115 case scenario.
It certainly cannot imo help the credibilty of their case, having demonstrated a clear and legal bias in they way they introduced the unlawful elements of APT.
I hope his spineless and biased handing of the PL's operations and rules , towards us and other clubs from the non-redshirt alliance, paints a very clear and obvious lack of any credibility or honesty. He must be sacked imo and watch as the Government implement the role of the Independent body to oversee the administration of the PL.
I believe that it must also cast an ominous shadow over the involvement of the PL and employment of the PiGMOL reps, if everything is to be viewed as truly unbaised and independent. But maybe I am just being greedy.
We hate your cunting club, not you personallyWhether they do or not I don't know. But there's a difference between a club's hierarchy and its fans. I've been getting dogs abuse on here (it's fine I'm thick skinned and I'm on a Man City forum after all so it's a case of Alice isn't in Kansas any more) but I'm not a representative of Arsenal Football Club I'm just a fan and have been my whole life so I think it would be cool if people could make that distinction. Making things personal isn't cool.
These divs could not even organise a boycott of one of their games.This is just giving us a little sample of how immense the piss boiling is going to be when found not guilty next spring, it's going to be glorious
View attachment 134310
I quoted GDM ("Top Lawyer & City fan") on there - and he got lots of likes!I see some have “borrowed” this for twitter
I’m proud
That is how I see it.As someone who is just catching up..
Am I correct to summarise - that the APT rules need to be voted back through (with a majority) to be legally implemented, but in doing so they have to include share holder loans?
If so the 9 clubs with shareholders loans will likely be reassessed? So basically this won't be voted back in, unless there is an agreement that prior loans are excluded?
Kicker.de German football site say City have won their case.
They might be a bit more cautious in the way they report the 115 case. Most pundits have been burned twice now. Once at UEFA and once with the PL. I think the Times and Mail have already softened their position towards City.Seriously embarrassing moment for that industry
And the millions pumped into the Arsenal from the Rwandan tourist board, where we can’t even send criminal illegal migrants (for free)Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.
It will surprise no one that the law expert quoted on the BBC article is an Arsenal fan, Simon Leaf.
Very sharpI’m going to wait until Der Spegiel give us the inside story !
Is there any suggestion of why they’ve done that? Makes no sense at face valueThey have sat on this decision for 14 days.