Weird calling Trump “she”, and he was never a prosecutor, but he has been prosecuted many, many times over his lifetime, so that is at least an easy mistake to make.No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
LOL.No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
No, everyone loves Kamala, she must be the next president of the united states.No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
You should do standup.Weird calling Trump “she”, and he was never a prosecutor, but he has been prosecuted many, many times over his lifetime, so that is at least an easy mistake to make.
I agree that he should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world (again).
You should do standup.
No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
Is that you Vlad? Been on vodka?No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
And the alternative is.....No-one in their right mind can possibly vote for her. She hasn't got her own mind, in as much as when she prosecuted in California and San Francisco, she claimed to be a 'progressive prosecutor' and yet jailed people for cannabis dealing and use.
She is a where the wind blows kind of politician, and should be nowhere near the most powerful position in the world.
'Whitehouse' you say? Just to be clear, do you mean the seat of US govt or the 70s /80s Paul Raymond jazz mag of the same name? I only ask as I had a similar misunderstanding in the 'men only' thread.And the alternative is.....
At least with Harris there's a chance she will listen to sage advice from experienced Whitehouse people
IF you believe that the polls are correct this time (as opposed to massively over estimating the GoP vote as they have done for the last 4-6 years)It’s too close to call by everyone’s account in the EC.
Does this apply also to non US citizens with no voting rights in the US?Just a reminder that there is no “middle ground”, “centrist” position with extremist anti-democratic demagogues.
You either actively oppose or support them.
Indifference, equivocation, or silence is the same as a support.
That does not mean you have to actively support Harris, or any other candidate. But if you do not actively oppose Trump, you are implicitly supporting him and all that he stands for, for the same reason that staying silent about racism, or sexism, or homophobia, or antisemitism, or Islamophobia that you directly observe is implicit support of it (all horrible bigoted stances Trump regularly espouses, by the way).
If that is what you want to do, then so be it—you are, of course, free to do that in an open, democratic society (unless Trump is elected, anyway).
But don’t insult everyone’s intelligence by attempting to claim you are a “centrist” or “just see more than one viewpoint at a time” by not denouncing and actively opposing Trump, MAGA, and the beliefs inherent to that movement. Absolutely no reasonable person would accept as valid another person holding such a position toward the KKK, or neo-Nazis, or Putin. And Trump and MAGA are absolutely on par with those ideological groups and affiliated leaders.
I’ll leave this quote that has resonated with me since I first read the sermon from which it originates when I was a young man (along with Letter From Birmingham Jail, which I think should be read in every classroom in the US and UK):
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter…
…A man dies when he refuses to stand up for that which is right. A man dies when he refuses to stand up for justice. A man dies when he refuses to take a stand for that which is true".
Trump has been morally and ethically dead for decades. And anyone that supports him, or merely stays ‘neutral’ as Trump spouts hate, amplifies nonsensical conspiracies, and mongers fear, all while continually signalling he has nothing but contempt for inclusive, democratic values, are complicit.
I think their electoral college system (which I won't pretend to fully understand) is the most likely thing to cause a disparity between the (popular) vote result and the election result. Polls are imho like bookmakers odds - a useful but not necessarily accurate guide to form.IF you believe that the polls are correct this time (as opposed to massively over estimating the GoP vote as they have done for the last 4-6 years)
You should sit down.You should do standup.
I'm not hot on the alternative. But seeing as we are scraping the barrel, I'd take Trump.And the alternative is.....
At least with Harris there's a chance she will listen to sage advice from experienced Whitehouse people
If like anyone to show me were I said I support Trump. Problem with this forum is if you don't nail your colours, you are automatically on the other side..You Trump and Vance would be a great 3 stooges tribute act.
I'm not hot on the alternative. But seeing as we are scraping the barrel, I'd take Trump.
If like anyone to show me were I said I support Trump. Problem with this forum is if you don't nail your colours, you are automatically on the other side..
Just a reminder that there is no “middle ground”, “centrist” position with extremist anti-democratic demagogues.
You either actively oppose or support them.
Indifference, equivocation, or silence is the same as a support.
That does not mean you have to actively support Harris, or any other candidate. But if you do not actively oppose Trump, you are implicitly supporting him and all that he stands for, for the same reason that staying silent about racism, or sexism, or homophobia, or transphobia, or antisemitism, or Islamophobia that you directly observe is implicit support of it (all horrible bigoted stances Trump regularly espouses, by the way).
If that is what you want to do, then so be it—you are, of course, free to do that in an open, democratic society (unless Trump is elected, anyway).
But don’t insult everyone’s intelligence by attempting to claim you are a “centrist” or “just see more than one viewpoint at a time” by not denouncing and actively opposing Trump, MAGA, and the beliefs inherent to that movement. Absolutely no reasonable person would accept as valid another person holding such a position toward the KKK, or neo-Nazis, or Putin. And Trump and MAGA are absolutely on par with those ideological groups and affiliated leaders.
I’ll leave this quote that has resonated with me since I first read the sermon from which it originates when I was a young man (along with Letter From Birmingham Jail, which I think should be read in every classroom in the US and UK):
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter…
…A man dies when he refuses to stand up for that which is right. A man dies when he refuses to stand up for justice. A man dies when he refuses to take a stand for that which is true".
Trump has been morally and ethically dead for decades. And anyone that supports him, or merely stays ‘neutral’ as Trump spouts hate, amplifies nonsensical conspiracies, and mongers fear, all while continually signalling he has nothing but contempt for inclusive, democratic values, are complicit.