bet there's a fair amount of dried jizz plastered around
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Benjamin Mendy | Joins Pogon Szczecin (p92)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Consent you say?Next door to a replacement plot I got consent for years back.
Strictly Consensual.bet there's a fair amount of dried jizz plastered around
york away to this!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 11,055
Yes, your honour...Consent you say?
GrealishHow many other new signing have had 6 year contracts bar Mendy and Kalvin Phillips?
Hoghead
Well-Known Member
Bump.
Has this been settled yet. Not seen anything in the msm and I'm sure it would be headline news whichever way the ruling went.
Has this been settled yet. Not seen anything in the msm and I'm sure it would be headline news whichever way the ruling went.
Kinkys Left Foot
Well-Known Member
Sshhhh NDA's all round.
Really_here
Well-Known Member
Benjamin Mendy faces former club Manchester City in a two-day employment tribunal starting this morning.
Mendy claims City failed to pay his wages between September 2021 until his contract ended in June 2023.
He had been suspended by City after being charged with a number of serious criminal offences assault in the September but was found not guilty on all counts in 2023.
Mendy claims City failed to pay his wages between September 2021 until his contract ended in June 2023.
He had been suspended by City after being charged with a number of serious criminal offences assault in the September but was found not guilty on all counts in 2023.
The Lightbowne Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 6,756
- Team supported
- City
I wonder if his solicitors are better than ours ? ;-)Benjamin Mendy faces former club Manchester City in a two-day employment tribunal starting this morning.
Mendy claims City failed to pay his wages between September 2021 until his contract ended in June 2023.
He had been suspended by City after being charged with a number of serious criminal offences assault in the September but was found not guilty on all counts in 2023.
Really_here
Well-Known Member
Be interesting to see the outcome. I think he has a case.I wonder if his solicitors are better than ours ? ;-)
The Lightbowne Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 6,756
- Team supported
- City
I do as well. The guy was found innocent at the end of the day.Be interesting to see the outcome. I think he has a case.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Fuck me our lawyers are going to be minted.
Really_here
Well-Known Member
I would imagine this is peanuts compared to their recent income !!Fuck me our lawyers are going to be minted.
Blue Llama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 5,634
Certainly has. Unfortunately for City his being useless is not an argument they can use. Surprised they haven't come to an agreement based on wages minus a discount for him not being able to work.Be interesting to see the outcome. I think he has a case.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Couldn't be bothered going back through the thread but didn't we originally suspend him on full pay until he breached bail conditions and got locked up? That's down to him if true, regardless of the final outcome of the charges.Be interesting to see the outcome. I think he has a case.
He definitely got locked up for breaching bail. Then had to live at his home address and give up his passport.Couldn't be bothered going back through the thread but didn't we originally suspend him on full pay until he breached bail conditions and got locked up? That's down to him if true, regardless of the final outcome of the charges.
Surprised City aren't counter-suing for loss of earnings on the transfer fee and signing-on fee. Maybe we are.
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 9,000
- Team supported
- MCFC
I do as well. The guy was found innocent at the end of the day.
I don’t know. And I do mean literally that I don’t know. But I do know that employment law does heavily favour the employer, in this country at least.
Whatever the outcome of the trial, if an employee is incapable of fulfilling their contractually duties, for whatever reason, I’m guessing law would normally look favourably on the employer if they decided not to pay them.
It would be a bit embarrassing and surprising, if these best lawyers in the world we keep hearing about have advised the club badly on something as pretty basic as this.
BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,516
yep agreed. It all depends what was in his contract but City should be paying him his basic wages plus bonuses.I do as well. The guy was found innocent at the end of the day.
I do as well. The guy was found innocent at the end of the day.
The burden of proof is (rightly) extremely high for a criminal conviction.
The barrier for suspending someone at work/ending a contract would be a lot lower.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Because...yep agreed. It all depends what was in his contract but City should be paying him his basic wages plus bonuses.