Benjamin Mendy | Joins Pogon Szczecin (p92)

kaz7 said:
He is trashing the club and some players like his life depends on it , i always hated him , got piled on for saying he collects trophies he hasnt earned , bragging about it on twitter and insta , perhaps believe auntie kaz next time !
Click to expand...
He was charged on the most dubious evidence going. It was imo disgraceful that he was charged.
You don't like him fine but he has a right to ask for what he believes he is entitled to.
 
BerkshireBlue said:
but it was reported on the same day it was dropped. It just didn't happen, he was remanded for rape charges and was proven not guilty for those charges
Click to expand...
That doesn't make sense.
What was reported on the same day it was dropped ?
He was on bail. He was remanded in custody because he breached his bail.
I know he was found not guilty of rape.
 
Blue Mist said:
He was charged on the most dubious evidence going. It was imo disgraceful that he was charged.
You don't like him fine but he has a right to ask for what he believes he is entitled to.
Click to expand...

It's not the clubs fault he was charged on dubious evidence, nor that he breached his bail conditions and got himself banged up. If he's legally entitled to more money we'll have to pay it. No amount of crying in the media will help him win the case.
 
balotelli's back pocket said:
The vast majority of us would never dream of behaving in the way that Mendy admitted was commonplace during his trial.
Click to expand...
Behaving sadly is not a criminal offence.
The story the women gave was a tissue of lies. He should nit have been charged and I hope no man is ever similarly charged on the basis of such so called evidence.
 
paulchapo said:
It's not the clubs fault he was charged on dubious evidence, nor that he breached his bail conditions and got himself banged up. If he's legally entitled to more money we'll have to pay it. No amount of crying in the media will help him win the case.
Click to expand...
I agree, perhaps it was the way Kaz phrased it.
 
Blue Mist said:
Behaving sadly is not a criminal offence.
The story the women gave was a tissue of lies. He should nit have been charged and I hope no man is ever similarly charged on the basis of such so called evidence.
Click to expand...
It’s not but maybe it should be when an overwhelming body of evidence shows you’re a wrong un despite not having broken any laws
 
Blue Mist said:
That doesn't make sense.
What was reported on the same day it was dropped ?
He was on bail. He was remanded in custody because he breached his bail.
I know he was found not guilty of rape.
Click to expand...
he was up in court for a load of charges including rape and breaches of bail August 27th 2021 he was sent to prison on this day and the court dropped the breaches of bail claims on that day. The shite newspapers like the sun and mirror reported on the breach of bail as they thought it had more clicks potential whilst other papers say it was dropped and didn't bother mentioning other than one sentence
 
Blue Mist said:
He was charged on the most dubious evidence going. It was imo disgraceful that he was charged.
You don't like him fine but he has a right to ask for what he believes he is entitled to.
Click to expand...
Maybe he can , but publicly bashing your team
mates is acting like looser
 
Banned by the FA and unable to play yet thinks he should have been paid. That’s just the initial period. The period after he breached his bail ridiculous.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
We will have to pay up his contract. He was innocent so can’t see how we avoid that. Not sure why we would even contest it to be honest.
Click to expand...
You only have to read one of the articles on the case today to learn why:
1. When was in custody he could not turn up to work, hence no pay.
2. When he was on bail, the FA put a ban on him playing, hence no pay.
3. When he breached his bail and went back to jail, guess what? No pay.
 
paulchapo said:
No firm I know of allows an employee facing such serious charges to carry on working. For a high profile footballer it would be impossible for him to play. They are usually suspended on pay though. 500 grand a week, were we really paying that wanker that much???
Click to expand...
Might be worth deleting this post to stop the urges to correct something wrong on the internet and blow up your alerts!
 
ctwrd said:
You only have to read one of the articles on the case today to learn why:
1. When was in custody he could not turn up to work, hence no pay.
2. When he was on bail, the FA put a ban on him playing, hence no pay.
3. When he breached his bail and went back to jail, guess what? No pay.
Click to expand...
All true but it depends what it says in his contract. The reason so few of these cases go to tribunals is that employment law usual works in the worker's favour. The complication will not be his wages though but his appearance money. Let's wait and see what happens.
 
Axel Freed said:
It’s not but maybe it should be when an overwhelming body of evidence shows you’re a wrong un despite not having broken any laws
Click to expand...
What overwhelming body of evidence?
You mean he had a lot of money and a high sex drive.
What did he do wrong ?
What did he do wrong that any single, early 20's lad wouldn't do ?
I really find some of these reactions bizarre.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top