Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.I don’t see the issue as such with the article
Watched a few air shows there.Can I just say that I have never worked at Woodford?
This is the narrative they put out. City, who have infinite financial resources, are prepared to spend whatever it takes on legal manoeuvres in order to kill any restrictions on spending.Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.
Did the Trafford team get a much larger deal off their shirt sponsors? Surely a midtable team should not be getting more than the Dips ?Liverpool have set up a £60 million shirt deal with Adidas yet the premier league knocked us back on the Etihad deal which covers so much more. Surely this is more ammunition for the club.
The PL managed to successfully convince the independent panel of KCs that the acted .....Really ! Was there a need to put it as City's really expensively assembled group of lawyers convinced the panel, no mention that the premier leagues expensively assembled group of lawyers failing to convince them of anything.
Written by that slimy toad Rob Harris - why am I not surprised?big clue at the top of the email
![]()
How Man City's fight to fend off spending restrictions is ripping the Premier League apart
Premier League clubs have held talks to reconfigure rules related to losses and income - with the meeting necessary after City's lawyers convinced a panel that aspects of the regulations were in breach of competition law.news.sky.com
"with the meeting necessary after City's lawyers convinced a panel that aspects of the regulations were in breach of competition law"Written by that slimy toad Rob Harris - why am I not surprised?
Sorry, misunderstood your post. There are several fundamental issues with this article already highlighted by various posters which you could maybe scroll back to read.I don’t see the issue as such with the article
Can I just say that I have never worked at Woodford?
There were quite a few of them. Managers and office wallahs.Can I just say that I have never worked at Woodford?
BAe Woodford was a real throwback - huge private runway, luxurious office suites and staff facilities, massive hangers full of obsolescent Nimrod nose cones and all in a beautiful Cheshire parkland setting.There were quite a few of them. Managers and office wallahs.
I saw the planes on test flights.I played football there if that counts
I sense a little anger. Great.Sorry, misunderstood your post. There are many fundamental issues with this article already highlighted by various posters which you could maybe scroll back to read. I complained about his use of the phrase "Abu Dhabi-funded Man City" singling us out from all the other PL clubs - with the various different countries funding them (as listed). The Equality Act (2010) defines ethnic discrimination as treating a group or a member of that group unfavourably because of national origin so it's blatantly racist and illegal. Harris is a disgusting and stupid City hating cartel shill, regularly used to pump their 'dirty cheating arab oil club' narrative through client media such as Sky. It seems that its constant repetition has sadly led even longstanding posters like yourself not to recognise the lies and slurs central to a decade long US redshirt propaganda campaign designed to destroy our club.
Chadderton?Can I just say that I have never worked at Woodford?
Written by that slimy toad Rob Harris - why am I not surprised?
Didn't seem to ripping the PL apart when the rags were winning title after title with unrestricted spending.![]()
How Man City's fight to fend off spending restrictions is ripping the Premier League apart
Premier League clubs have held talks to reconfigure rules related to losses and income - with the meeting necessary after City's lawyers convinced a panel that aspects of the regulations were in breach of competition law.news.sky.com
And here is something completely different....
We're indirectly responsible for ripping the Premier League apart?
I am absolutely lost for words. The shite way we've been treated by the Premier League? Yeah ok then.