Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 30,003
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Truth.Bit pompous that ??
Truth.Bit pompous that ??
That's what I meant to say. Just couldn't find the right words.There is absolutely fuck all to be gleaned from Tolmie's post. It is meaningless.
As i understand it, there is nothing on the PL rules that deal with any other contract any manager has with another employer, so what Mancini did or didn't do as part of his other contract is moot?
"Not encouraging I own"Fingers crossed icons from Tolmie usually spell doom. Things obviously aren't going well. We're fucked or words to that effect.
Could be wrong but it doesn't sound great.
It'll all come out in the wash."Not encouraging I own"
Spot-on as always GDB. Watch-out for the "prayers" emoji. It's Tolmie-talk for Defcon 1.Fingers crossed icons from Tolmie usually spell doom. Things obviously aren't going well. We're fucked or words to that effect.
Could be wrong but it doesn't sound great.
What's he said?Calling @tolmie's hairdoo ….talk to us sir!
last time he used that phrase was just before the super league stuff came outTolm tweeted ‘I sense a disturbance in the force’ with a fingers crossed icon
It's no burning bush but it could be a sign.last time he used that phrase was just before the super league stuff came out
I thought that was obvious.I was fucking about. You'll take yourselves to an early grave, if you believe everything you read.
Maybe tolmie just likes different variations of fingering ?Fingers crossed icons from Tolmie usually spell doom. Things obviously aren't going well. We're fucked or words to that effect.
Could be wrong but it doesn't sound great.
Guessing Tolmie's tweet/post was due to the breaking news (at the time) on the APT stuff.
Don't think there's anything of relevance to this, although cryptic posts don't help here imo.
He just wants to challenge burnley’s fan .What's he said?
Love the guy cos he tipped us Haaland was coming, but (thankfully) Jude Bellend wrong.
I need updating
Mancini didn’t have to step foot in AD to fulfil his company’s contractIt's almost inevitable that it won't be a binary Guilty or Not Guilty. It will be a spectrum of judgments eg Etihad, Aabar sponsorships are cleared, ie all questions answered. Worst case scenario, the contested Etisalat £30m payment could be ruled as acting in bad faith, in one FY only. Hopefully all other Etisalat payments are completely cleared, there is nothing else about Etisalat that is contentious and in the public domain. If Mancini is considered as not time barred and he didn't set foot in Abu Dhabi in one specific FY, then once again that could be ruled bad faith, in one FY. The non cooperation charges can only lead to non sporting sanctions, so bollocks to them. It terns of severity of possible sporting sanction, I've always considered the weighing to be something like:-
Etihad 80% (£600m 10 year deal)
Etisalat 5%
Aabar 5%
Mancini 5%
Toure/Fordham 5%
Non cooperation 0%