BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
Like the thought of thatThe tip off may have come from the premier league itself. If the board realises the damage Masters has done & need a fall guy they may have just hung him out to dry.
Like the thought of thatThe tip off may have come from the premier league itself. If the board realises the damage Masters has done & need a fall guy they may have just hung him out to dry.
Like the thought of that
So in effect, Masters has been hung by his Masters,the problem with that is,that the Masters who hung Masters ,will still be around.The tip off may have come from the premier league itself. If the board realises the damage Masters has done & need a fall guy they may have just hung him out to dry.
Yea but they are now a known Quantity by City and won't want to mess with Khaldoon and City again .So in effect, Masters has been hung by his Masters,the problem with that is,that the Masters who hung Masters ,will still be around.
An even wiser man said..."Organised and clear"as a wise man once said.
Well Matt Lawton having access to the 165 page submission at this week’s arbitration is clearly the most obvious case of why you would not cooperate with or submit anything they ask forMaybe the discovery request is to ensure we can prove ( beyond reasonable doubt ) our defence against the charge of non-cooperation with the PL? In particular their requests for further information which we consider business sensitive!
If there is evidence of the PL sharing confidential information with our competitors it fully justifies our refusal to co-operate beyond a certain point?
CTID
They'll be back when we climb the divisions againBut what about the new fans and tourists?
Can be the new Wrexham!They'll be back when we climb the divisions again