We were there , there is no need to keep repeating yourself every post , some players divide more than others , the raz threads were awful. Grealish costed a record hundred million pounds , he has been terrible for eighteen months , we are past talking about the treble and are where we are. Even his ardent supporters think he needs to leave. Just you left dying on this hill now. If we cant talk about our record signing then who can we talk about? Was he worth the money ? No
You are avoiding talking about the last eighteen months, why?
The thread title is performance 2024/25 season. The first 3 posts I responded to a couple of days ago were slating Grealish over the last 2.5/3 years. Firstly on this then, the natural periods to look at are either Grealish's performances over the whole time he has been here or in the 2024/25 season. What is disgraceful is for so called City fans to pick an arbitrary period of the last 12/18 months so they can shoehorn a reference in that Grealish hasn't scored in the last year - that's getting in to enemy within territory. And were these same City fans slating Savinho 2/3 weeks ago?
If it's this season that is to be looked at, then Grealish has started 1 Premier League defeat which I don't think warrants the MASSIVE epic meltdown of this thread with it's 285 pages which has more than 4 times the pages of the Akanji, Ake and Dias threads combined.
The haters are totally fixated on the £100m fee but who has been a more successful £100m player than Grealish? That's in real life and not fantasy football land.
And what the haters don't realise is that you cannot beat hindsight and they are desperately trying to rail against it. With Grealish signed and in the side the treble was won and 4 in a row was secured and that is a factual statement. And that isn't me saying Grealish won it all on his own as certain posters seem to want to twist. If instead player X was signed for the £100m then there is absolutely no guarantee the treble and/or 4 in a row would be secured.
So if we now go back to August 2021 and whether I'd sign Grealish for £100m then the answer is every fucking day of the week because that means the treble and 4 in a row are secured. If instead the £100m was spent on another player then what is the probability of the treble and 4 in a row being secured? Because it isn't 100%. So with the choice or Grealish being signed and the treble and 4 in a row being 100% secured or another player being bought for £100m with the treble and and 4 in a row not being guaranteed, then why wouldn't any City fan choose the Grealish signing?
As to whether Grealish was worth the money. What value do you put on the treble? What value do you put on 4 in a row? (and with respect with you again mentioning the last 18 months, you don't seem to get the significance of winning 4 English League titles in a row for the first time in the history of English football). I think the treble's worth £100m. And I think 4 in a row's worth £100m. So for me, Grealish was cheap at half the price.
So sliding doors moment, if you could go back to August 2021 in a time machine, would you sign Grealish for £100m? And if not, why not?