Thanks Mr K . I knew I could rely on you.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Southport attacker pleads guilty to murdering three girls | Sentenced to 52 years in prison
- Thread starter CTID1988
- Start date
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
If anyone's the big minge it's that fucking trolling prick who is completely and utterly incapable of understanding plain English, and has been wumming throughout the thread. You only need to have a look at how many of his posts have been deleted to realise that.Fucks sake you big minge
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
That's him.Alan Lord? Bloody unit him.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 33,701
- Team supported
- Manchester City
If anyone's the big minge it's that fucking trolling prick who is completely and utterly incapable of understanding plain English, and has been wumming throughout the thread. You only need to have a look at how many of his posts have been deleted to realise that.
Just click "ignore' and you'll never have to deal with him again. Offering to meet people on the internet for a fight is a bit mental mate
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Who said anything about a fight? ;) But yeah, you're right. Thing is, that's what can happen when you're dealing with someone like him who's clearly not wired up properlyJust click "ignore' and you'll never have to deal with him again. Offering to meet people on the internet for a fight is a bit mental mate
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Says you. Now unless you've got anything constructive to say, get back on topicA key board warrior at their very best
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Bullet to the head, get it over and done with. I’ve always thought the death penalty is the easy way out, but there’s no point in this cretin existing.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Fawkes was hanged for treason.I know therefore the current definition of Terrorist is wrong. Guy Fawkes was a Terrorist but was Jack the Ripper?
jimharri
Moderator
Very hard reading the accounts of the events of that day. Three young kids slaughtered, senseless.
You do get yourself worked up. Why don’t you take that wise advice and click ignore. Simple really.Says you. Now unless you've got anything constructive to say, get back on topic
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Who is defending this creature?A key board warrior at their very best
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think his punishment was a bit more ‘drawn’ out than that!Fawkes was hanged for treason.
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
Come on let’s leave the tit for tat arguing out if it eh? Remember this is a thread that is about the murder of 3 little girls. Focus your anger and hatred at the **** responsible, not each other.
Well I would start with those who challenge anyone that calls him a terrorist.Who is defending this creature?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Your definition of a terrorist, or the legal definition?Well I would start with those who challenge anyone that calls him a terrorist.
Agreed. Well saidCome on let’s leave the tit for tat arguing out if it eh? Remember this is a thread that is about the murder of 3 little girls. Focus your anger and hatred at the **** responsible, not each other.
It is obviously based on perception. Starmer has already said they will look at the legal definition as it is clearly flawled.Your definition of a terrorist, or the legal definition?
Arguing over the minutia, as I believe you are doing, is treating this subject and the horror of what has transpired less seriously than it should be. I would be grateful, personally, if you could drop this particular argument as it is a matter of law, and not a matter of humanity, empathy, or grief. Changes in the law may follow.Well I would start with those who challenge anyone that calls him a terrorist.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
You haven’t answered the question. Your definition or the legal definition?It is obviously based on perception. Starmer has already said they will look at the legal definition as it is clearly flawled.